Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-21 Thread Zhang, Hong via petsc-dev
Pierre, We have fixed this bug in petsc-release (maint branch). Thanks for you report. Hong From: petsc-dev on behalf of Pierre Jolivet Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 2:10 AM To: Abhyankar, Shrirang G Cc: PETSc Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM Sorry for

Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-05 Thread Abhyankar, Shrirang G via petsc-dev
internally discussed the different pieces needed to make it robust, but we haven’t had time to work on it yet. Thanks, Shri From: Pierre Jolivet Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 at 2:11 AM To: "Abhyankar, Shrirang G" Cc: "Dener, Alp" , PETSc Development Subject: Re: [petsc-

Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-05 Thread Pierre Jolivet
> @Alp: Let me know if I can help you with the patch. > > Thanks, > Shri > > > From: petsc-dev on behalf of Pierre Jolivet > > Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 1:46 PM > To: "Dener, Alp" > Cc: PETSc Development > Subject: Re: [petsc-d

Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-04 Thread Abhyankar, Shrirang G via petsc-dev
, Alp" Cc: PETSc Development Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM Thanks to you both, I’ll forward this to my user. Pierre On 4 Aug 2020, at 7:30 PM, Dener, Alp mailto:ade...@anl.gov>> wrote: Hi Pierre, This is indeed an issue with TAO default tolerances. Specifically it has to do

Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-04 Thread Pierre Jolivet
Thanks to you both, I’ll forward this to my user. Pierre > On 4 Aug 2020, at 7:30 PM, Dener, Alp wrote: > > Hi Pierre, > > This is indeed an issue with TAO default tolerances. > > Specifically it has to do with constraint tolerances. The default value is an > exact zero. > > The problem shou

Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-04 Thread Dener, Alp via petsc-dev
Hi Pierre, This is indeed an issue with TAO default tolerances. Specifically it has to do with constraint tolerances. The default value is an exact zero. The problem should still work with line 89 commented out. Our default gradient tolerance is 1e-8. In your case, commenting out line 90 is ca

Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-04 Thread Munson, Todd via petsc-dev
Hi Pierre, I would say the answer to that question is "no, its not expected". We will look into fixing it. It seems like the default tolerances are being set to zero and the result is an inability to satisfy the constraints or gradient of the Lagrangian to that small of a tolerance. Thanks

Re: [petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-04 Thread Barry Smith
> On Aug 4, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Pierre Jolivet > wrote: > > Hello, > If I comment line 89 and 90 of src/tao/constrained/tutorials/ex1.c from > master, the example deadlocks with a single process. > Is this expected? > > Thanks, > Pierre > > $ ./ex1 -tao_monitor > Constrained Problem -

[petsc-dev] TAOPDIPM

2020-08-04 Thread Pierre Jolivet
Hello, If I comment line 89 and 90 of src/tao/constrained/tutorials/ex1.c from master, the example deadlocks with a single process. Is this expected? Thanks, Pierre $ ./ex1 -tao_monitor Constrained Problem - Solution should be f(1,1)=-2 0 TAO, Function value: 8., Residual: 8.48528