> Satish
>
> From: Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 2:17 PM
> To: Mills, Richard Tran
> Cc: petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] alternatives to cygwin on Windows with PETSc
>
>
>Ri
gt; • Have the ability equivalent to Windows process spawning
>>> cygwin process spawning Windows process. Wsl1 lacked this. Don't know about
>>> wsl2..
>>> >
>>> > Current issue with cygwin was some bash config issue. Even if we
>
if we manage
> to port build tools to wsl2 or alternative system, such sub-tool issues can
> still come up in the new system.
> >
> >
> > Satish
> >
> > From: Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev
> > Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 2:17 PM
>
> Satish
>
> From: Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 2:17 PM
> To: Mills, Richard Tran
> Cc: petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] alternatives to cygwin on Windows with PETSc
>
>
>R
sues can
>> still come up in the new system.
>>
>>
>> Satish
>>
>> From: Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev
>> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 2:17 PM
>> To: Mills, Richard Tran
>> Cc: petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov
>> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] alternatives to cy
sh config issue. Even if we manage to
> port build tools to wsl2 or alternative system, such sub-tool issues can
> still come up in the new system.
>
>
> Satish
>
> From: Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 2:17 PM
> To: Mills, Richard
Ah, OK. I was originally just thinking that many people would be happy if they
can get PETSc to simply work with GCC or Clang that they get from the package
manager used in the WSL setup. I believe both the Microsoft and Intel compilers
are all available for free these days, so I'll install
@mcs.anl.gov<mailto:petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] alternatives to cygwin on Windows with PETSc
Richard,
Thanks. The important thing is to be able to build PETSc for Microsoft and
Intel Windows compilers (so that users can use the libraries from the Microsoft
Richard,
Thanks. The important thing is to be able to build PETSc for Microsoft and
Intel Windows compilers (so that users can use the libraries from the Microsoft
development system as a "regular" Windows users).
Barry
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 3:59 PM, Mills, Richard Tran via
I played around with WSL1 quite some time ago and it seemed pretty promising. I
have not tried WSL2, but I'm guessing that it may be the best option for
building PETSc on a Windows 10 machine. I've got a Windows 10 machine (it
basically just runs my television/media center) and I'll give it a
"Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev" writes:
> Does it make sense to recommend/suggest git bash for Windows as an
> alternative/in addition to Cygwin?
I would love to be able to recommend git-bash and/or WSL2 (which now
includes a full Linux kernel). I don't have a system on which to test,
but
Does it make sense to recommend/suggest git bash for Windows as an
alternative/in addition to Cygwin?
Barry
12 matches
Mail list logo
