On 21 Jun 2019, at 13:58, Lawrence Mitchell mailto:we...@gmx.li>>
wrote:
Hi Vaclav,
On 21 Jun 2019, at 12:14, Hapla Vaclav via petsc-dev
mailto:petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
VecGetValuesSection() returns pointer values obtained as follows:
VecGetArray(v, &baseArray);
*values = &baseArray[s
Hi Vaclav,
> On 21 Jun 2019, at 12:14, Hapla Vaclav via petsc-dev
> wrote:
>
> VecGetValuesSection() returns pointer values obtained as follows:
>
> VecGetArray(v, &baseArray);
> *values = &baseArray[s->atlasOff[p]];
> VecRestoreArray(v, &baseArray);
>
> It looks to me scary.
> VecGetArray ma
VecGetValuesSection() returns pointer values obtained as follows:
VecGetArray(v, &baseArray);
*values = &baseArray[s->atlasOff[p]];
VecRestoreArray(v, &baseArray);
It looks to me scary.
VecGetArray manpage says: If the underlying vector data is not stored in a
contiguous array this routine will
