Re: [petsc-dev] petsc.h does not include (directly or indirectly) petscsf.h

2017-08-04 Thread Jed Brown
Barry Smith writes: >> Well, maybe that's an oversight, too. Including petscvec.h should >> include all what is available in the Vec package. Otherwise, why is >> petscis.h included in petscvec.h (It seems petscistypes.h is all what >> should be required for petscvec.h) ? I'm fine with doing thing

Re: [petsc-dev] petsc.h does not include (directly or indirectly) petscsf.h

2017-08-04 Thread Satish Balay
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Barry Smith wrote: > > > On Aug 4, 2017, at 4:40 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > > > > On 4 August 2017 at 01:38, Jed Brown wrote: > >> Lisandro Dalcin writes: > >> > >>> On 2 August 2017 at 17:49, Satish Balay wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Lisandro Dalcin wrote

Re: [petsc-dev] petsc.h does not include (directly or indirectly) petscsf.h

2017-08-04 Thread Barry Smith
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 4:40 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > > On 4 August 2017 at 01:38, Jed Brown wrote: >> Lisandro Dalcin writes: >> >>> On 2 August 2017 at 17:49, Satish Balay wrote: On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > Is this intentional or just an oversight? >>

Re: [petsc-dev] petsc.h does not include (directly or indirectly) petscsf.h

2017-08-04 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
On 4 August 2017 at 01:38, Jed Brown wrote: > Lisandro Dalcin writes: > >> On 2 August 2017 at 17:49, Satish Balay wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >>> Is this intentional or just an oversight? >>> >>> Probably an oversight.. >>> Should it be fixed in maint? >>

Re: [petsc-dev] petsc.h does not include (directly or indirectly) petscsf.h

2017-08-03 Thread Jed Brown
Lisandro Dalcin writes: > On 2 August 2017 at 17:49, Satish Balay wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >> >>> Is this intentional or just an oversight? >> >> Probably an oversight.. >> >>> Should it be fixed in maint? >> >> Sure - with the bug-fix branch off maint - with testi

Re: [petsc-dev] petsc.h does not include (directly or indirectly) petscsf.h

2017-08-03 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
On 2 August 2017 at 17:49, Satish Balay wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > >> Is this intentional or just an oversight? > > Probably an oversight.. > >> Should it be fixed in maint? > > Sure - with the bug-fix branch off maint - with testing in next first.. > Not sure about t

Re: [petsc-dev] petsc.h does not include (directly or indirectly) petscsf.h

2017-08-02 Thread Satish Balay
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > Is this intentional or just an oversight? Probably an oversight.. > Should it be fixed in maint? Sure - with the bug-fix branch off maint - with testing in next first.. Satish

[petsc-dev] petsc.h does not include (directly or indirectly) petscsf.h

2017-08-02 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
Is this intentional or just an oversight? Should it be fixed in maint? -- Lisandro Dalcin Research Scientist Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences & Engineering (CEMSE) Extreme Computing Research Center (ECRC) King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) http: