Re: [petsc-dev] type(*) not supported by multiple test fortran compilers we use

"Smith, Barry F." writes: > From below it looks like OpenMPI handles many compilers that > don't handle type(*) by using some horrible non-portable > pragmas? I can't say it excites me to want to add all the crap > to PETSc configure/source. > >

Re: [petsc-dev] type(*) not supported by multiple test fortran compilers we use

Jed, Thanks for checking this. Satish, Can you please upgrade the admittedly ancient compilers? Maybe this will help for some compilers. From below it looks like OpenMPI handles many compilers that don't handle type(*) by using some horrible non-portable pragmas? I

Re: [petsc-dev] type(*) not supported by multiple test fortran compilers we use

"Smith, Barry F." writes: >> On Oct 26, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Jed Brown wrote: >> >> Which compilers don't work? > >Your time is no more valuable than anyone else's. You can see the failed > red lines at > >

Re: [petsc-dev] type(*) not supported by multiple test fortran compilers we use

> On Oct 26, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Jed Brown wrote: > > Which compilers don't work? Your time is no more valuable than anyone else's. You can see the failed red lines at ftp://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2017/10/29/next.html and click through to see the

Re: [petsc-dev] type(*) not supported by multiple test fortran compilers we use

Which compilers don't work? "Smith, Barry F." writes: >Jed, > > Unfortunately multiple fortran compilers we use do not support type(*) so > we either configure check this stuff (annoying) or stop supporting lots of > Fortran compilers. > >Satish, > >I

[petsc-dev] type(*) not supported by multiple test fortran compilers we use

Jed, Unfortunately multiple fortran compilers we use do not support type(*) so we either configure check this stuff (annoying) or stop supporting lots of Fortran compilers. Satish, I guess you need to check all the failed Fortran compilers and see if they have versions that