Fwd: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)

2008-12-04 Thread Matthew Knepley
I for one think it should be possible to remove 'make' from the toolchain, leaving us with only win32fe, which we distribute. Thus I think we could abandon cygwin once and for all. I would even be willing to write a \emph{make clone} to accomplish this, even though I am a committed enemy of make

Fwd: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)

2008-12-04 Thread Satish Balay
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Matthew Knepley wrote: I for one think it should be possible to remove 'make' from the toolchain, leaving us with only win32fe, which we distribute. Thus I think we could abandon cygwin once and for all. I would even be willing to write a \emph{make clone} to accomplish

Fwd: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)

2008-12-04 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Satish Balay balay at mcs.anl.gov wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Matthew Knepley wrote: I for one think it should be possible to remove 'make' from the toolchain, leaving us with only win32fe, which we distribute. Thus I think we could abandon cygwin once and