Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>> We could create a new one if it doesn't exist, even with
>> MAT_REUSE_MATRIX, but that feels wrong to me.
>
> Why do you have such feeling?
Suppose I run with -log_summary and see that most of my memory usage is
for ma
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
>>> We could create a new one if it doesn't exist, even with
>>> MAT_REUSE_MATRIX, but that feels wrong to me.
>>
>> Why do you have such feeling?
>
> Suppose I run with
Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> I like a lot the new API, though I would like to comment on the change
> below and previous behaviour of MatGetSubMatrix() in 3.0.:
>
> Author: Jed Brown 2009-05-27 15:15:56
> Committer: Jed Brown 2009-05-27 15:15:56
> Parent: 13687:1da19bea6533 (Update ex19 output for
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> I like a lot the new API, though I would like to comment on the change
>> below and previous behaviour of MatGetSubMatrix() in 3.0.:
>>
>> Author: Jed Brown ?2009-05-27 15:15:56
>> Committer: Jed Brown ?2009-05-27 15:15
I like a lot the new API, though I would like to comment on the change
below and previous behaviour of MatGetSubMatrix() in 3.0.:
Author: Jed Brown 2009-05-27 15:15:56
Committer: Jed Brown 2009-05-27 15:15:56
Parent: 13687:1da19bea6533 (Update ex19 output for minlambda)
Child: 13689:7903ebaee
