Ok, I have pushed all these changes, including PetscMap -->
PetscLayout
Barry
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Dima Karpeyev wrote:
> What about a different name? I vote for PetscLayout, because that's
> what it is.
> Dmitry.
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Matthew Knepley
> wrot
What about a different name? I vote for PetscLayout, because that's what it is.
Dmitry.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> I wanted that 10 years ago.
>
> ? Matt
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>>
>> ? PetscMap is a strange beast in PETSc.
>>
>> 1)
I wanted that 10 years ago.
Matt
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> PetscMap is a strange beast in PETSc.
>
> 1) it is not a PetscObject (that is it has no PETSc header)
> 2) it is used as a PetscMap* instead of PetscMap like most objects
> 3) it does not have a PetscMa
PetscMap is a strange beast in PETSc.
1) it is not a PetscObject (that is it has no PETSc header)
2) it is used as a PetscMap* instead of PetscMap like most objects
3) it does not have a PetscMapCreate() instead it has a
PetscMapInitialize() which is like a create except it does not malloc
