>
> What solver would I use to do a factorization of a dense parallel matrix w/
> plapack?
MAT_SOLVER_PLAPACK.
See ~petsc-3.0.0/src/mat/examples/tests/ex103.c
Hong
>
> I don't see a
>
> MPI_SOLVER_PLAPACK
>
> ?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Hong Zhang wrote:
>
>>
Is MatCreateMP
I'm getting plapack errors in "external library" with
MatMatMult_MPIDense_MPIDense
with plapack? How is memory handled for a matrix
of type MATMPIDENSE? Are all NxN entries allocated and ready for
use at time of creation? or do I have to MatInsertValues
then Assemble to be ready to use a matri
Hi Hong,
What solver would I use to do
a factorization of a dense parallel matrix w/ plapack?
I don't see a
MPI_SOLVER_PLAPACK
?
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Hong Zhang wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Is MatCreateMPIDense the recommended matrix type to interface w/ mumps ?
>>> Does it use a sparse direct stor
MatMatMult(X,Y,...,...,Z)
where X is MPIDENSE and Y is MPIAIJ seems to work but
when X is MPIAIJ and Y is MPIDENSE doesn't ? says its not supported.
there seems to be all permuations in the source
MatMatMult_MPIAIJ_MPIDense
MatMatMult_MPIDense_MPIAIJ
MatMatMult_MPIAIJ_MPIAIJ
MatMatMult_MPI
ranted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090312/3f90ac77/attachment-0001.htm>
>>
>> Is MatCreateMPIDense the recommended matrix type to interface w/ mumps ?
>> Does it use a sparse direct storage or allocate the full n x n matrix?
>
>
> No, MUMPS is "sparse direct" so it uses MPIAIJ.
For mpi dense matrix, you can use plapack
Hong
>
>
>>
>> df
>>
>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Ma
e.
Do you help me? Thanks.
Bye.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090312/cfa7bb95/attachment.htm>
MatLUFactorSymbolic(Afact,A,isrow,iscol,&info);
>>>>> MatLUFactorNumeric(Afact,A,&info);
>>>>> MatMatSolve(Afact,B,X);
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> my solve keeps running out of memory
>>>>>
>>>>> "[0]PETSC ERROR: Memory requested xxx!"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> is this in bytes? I can't tell if the problem I'm trying to solve
>>>>> is too large form my machine or if I just have bug in the call
>>>>> sequence.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> thank you,
>>>>> David Fuentes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments
>> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
>> lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090312/8a438ba3/attachment.htm>
Thanks Matt,
Is MatCreateMPIDense the recommended matrix type to interface w/ mumps ?
Does it use a sparse direct storage or allocate the full n x n matrix?
df
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> You can try using a sparse direct solver like MUMPS instead of PETSc LU.
>
> Matt
You have to upgrade to 3.0.0 to expect these to work.
Barry
On Mar 12, 2009, at 8:20 AM, Santolo Felaco wrote:
> Hi I use Petsc 2.3.1 (I don't use the last version because I work on
> a software developed with this version).
> I tried to used the Petsc socket, but the client and server
> Do you help me? Thanks.
>>> Bye.
>>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090312/a08e9943/attachment.htm>
;
>>> "[0]PETSC ERROR: Memory requested xxx!"
>>>
>>>
>>> is this in bytes? I can't tell if the problem I'm trying to solve
>>> is too large form my machine or if I just have bug in the call sequence.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> thank you,
>>> David Fuentes
>>>
>>>
>>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090312/cbf2390e/attachment.htm>
Thanks Hong,
The complete error message is attached. I think I just had too big
of a matrix. The matrix i'm trying to factor is 327680 x 327680
[0]PETSC ERROR: - Error Message
[0]PETSC ERROR: Out of memory. This could be due to allocating
David,
I do not see any problem with the calling sequence.
The memory is determined in MatLUFactorSymbolic().
Does your code crashes within MatLUFactorSymbolic()?
Please send us complete error message.
Hong
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, David Fuentes wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a sparse matrix, A, wi
rbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090312/d47bf614/attachment.htm>
15 matches
Mail list logo