-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090325/54779752/attachment.htm>
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090325/9be43009/attachment.pgp>
eriments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090325/f27a8893/attachment-0001.htm>
before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090325/1fb2fcfd/attachment.htm>
ttp://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090325/d6fba4c8/attachment.htm>
han any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090325/07fd97c0/attachment.htm>
Hi
Can the petsc parallel vectors be used with two different communicators? For
instance, I have created two different communicators called FEA_Comm and
FSI_Comm. The total number of processes are x+y. FSI_Comm works on x+y but
FEA_Comm works only on x.
Now I am trying to create parallel vecto