[petsc-users] parallel vector of integers

2011-10-18 Thread Ethan Coon
Seems to me that the better argument for this would be that arbitrary precision scatters (done right) would be an important step on the path toward single-precision preconditioning. Surely this would make a measurable difference... Ethan On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 20:49 -0500, Barry Smith wrote: > On

[petsc-users] parallel vector of integers

2011-10-18 Thread Barry Smith
On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Ethan Coon wrote: > Seems to me that the better argument for this would be that arbitrary > precision scatters (done right) would be an important step on the path > toward single-precision preconditioning. Surely this would make a > measurable difference... The

[petsc-users] parallel vector of integers

2011-10-18 Thread Dominik Szczerba
---- > > Ethan Coon > > Post-Doctoral Researcher > > Applied Mathematics - T-5 > > Los Alamos National Laboratory > > 505-665-8289 > > > > http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~ecoon/ > > > > > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20111018/fb080ab4/attachment.htm>

[petsc-users] parallel vector of integers

2011-10-18 Thread Barry Smith
On Oct 18, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Dominik Szczerba wrote: > May I draw your attention how Kitware did it in VTK - avoiding templates, but > using C++: > > http://www.vtk.org/doc/release/5.8/html/a00466.html Thanks, we'll take a look at this. Barry > > Regards, Dominik > > On Tue, Oct 18

[petsc-users] parallel vector of integers

2011-10-18 Thread Chetan Jhurani
> From: petsc-users-bounces at mcs.anl.gov On Behalf Of Dominik Szczerba > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:09 PM > To: PETSc users list > Subject: Re: [petsc-users] parallel vector of integers > > May I draw your attention how Kitware did it in VTK - avoiding templates, but > using C++: > > ht

[petsc-users] parallel vector of integers

2011-10-18 Thread Dominik Szczerba
solve big > problems this way (2^53 is a big number), but I still > find it aesthetically displeasing. > > >> > > >> So let's increase the complexity of PETSc exponentially JUST so one > little thing won't be "aesthetically displeasing"? > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Ethan Coon > > > Post-Doctoral Researcher > > > Applied Mathematics - T-5 > > > Los Alamos National Laboratory > > > 505-665-8289 > > > > > > http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~ecoon/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20111018/ec98d77f/attachment.htm>