> On Apr 14, 2019, at 12:00 AM, Yuyun Yang wrote:
>
> I tried using another linear solver (via command line options) and the
> binaryoutput file was produced, but nothing was produced for MumpsCholesky.
> Does that mean it didn't even do a single linear solve?
This is only a guess but sin
I tried using another linear solver (via command line options) and the
binaryoutput file was produced, but nothing was produced for MumpsCholesky.
Does that mean it didn't even do a single linear solve?
Best regards,
Yuyun
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Barry F.
Sent: Saturday, April
It will be in the directory where the program is run.
Perhaps you are not calling KSPSetFromOptions()? This is where it is checked.
Barry
> On Apr 13, 2019, at 7:24 PM, Yuyun Yang wrote:
>
> I tried doing -ksp_view_mat binary, but I don't see the binaryoutput file
> being produced i
I tried doing -ksp_view_mat binary, but I don't see the binaryoutput file being
produced in my output or source file directories. Is it located somewhere else?
Best regards,
Yuyun
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Barry F.
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 10:21 PM
To: Yuyun Yang
Cc: petsc
https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/pull-requests/1539/update-to-the-lastest-fftw-release/diff
> On Apr 11, 2019, at 6:49 PM, Sajid Ali via petsc-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi PETSc Developers,
>
> To run an example that involves the petsc-fftw interface, I loaded both petsc
> and fftw modules (linke
this refinement seems to work pretty well for what I was looking for.
still testing... but tetgen seems to load these background mesh files at
the higher resolution to guide the refinement?
$ tetgen -Vrmqk coarse.1.node
Opening coarse.1.node.
Opening coarse.1.ele.
Opening coarse.1.face.
Opening c
