Yes it worked. I get exactly the same vector as reported in the output file
I will test it now with my problem and if I see anything strange I will let you
know.
Thank you so much
Eugenio
Eugenio Aulisa
Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
Texas Tech University
Lubbock TX, 79409-1042
With VecGhostUpdateBegin(v, INSERT_VALUES, SCATTER_REVERSE), the owner will get
updated by ghost values. So in your case 1, proc0 gets either value1 or value2
from proc1/2; in case 2; proc0 gets either value0 or value2 from proc1/2.
In short, you could not achieve your goal with INSERT_VALUES.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:11 AM Aulisa, Eugenio via petsc-users
mailto:petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
Hi,
I have a vector with ghost nodes where each process may or may not change the
value of a specific ghost node (using INSERT_VALUES).
At the end I would like for each process, that
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:11 AM Aulisa, Eugenio via petsc-users
mailto:petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
Hi,
I have a vector with ghost nodes where each process may or may not change the
value of a specific ghost node (using INSERT_VALUES).
At the end I would like for each process, that see a
Hi,
I have a vector with ghost nodes where each process may or may not change the
value of a specific ghost node (using INSERT_VALUES).
At the end I would like for each process, that see a particular ghost node, to
have the smallest of the set values.
I do not think there is a
