ch it looks like
> you have done.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> Kind regards,
> Morten
>
>
> From: Matthew Knepley [knep...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 2:19 PM
> To: Morten Nobel-Jørgensen
> Cc: PETSc [petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov]
> Sub
to setup the default DM section, which it looks
like you have done.
Thanks,
Matt
> Kind regards,
> Morten
>
>
> --
> *From:* Matthew Knepley [knep...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, September 26, 2016 2:19 PM
> *To:* Morten Nobel-Jørgen
ind regards,
Morten
From: Matthew Knepley [knep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 2:19 PM
To: Morten Nobel-Jørgensen
Cc: PETSc [petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov]
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex problem
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Morten Nobel-Jørgen
---
> *From:* petsc-users-boun...@mcs.anl.gov [petsc-users-boun...@mcs.anl.gov]
> on behalf of Morten Nobel-Jørgensen [m...@dtu.dk]
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 25, 2016 11:15 AM
> *To:* Matthew Knepley
> *Cc:* PETSc [petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov]
> *Subject:* Re: [pe
From: petsc-users-boun...@mcs.anl.gov [petsc-users-boun...@mcs.anl.gov] on
behalf of Morten Nobel-Jørgensen [m...@dtu.dk]
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 11:15 AM
To: Matthew Knepley
Cc: PETSc [petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov]
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex problem
Hi
Nobel-Jørgensen
Cc: PETSc [petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov]
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex problem
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Matthew Knepley
<knep...@gmail.com<mailto:knep...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Morten Nobel-Jørgensen
<m...@dtu.dk<mailto:m
...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, September 09, 2016 12:21 PM
>> *To:* Morten Nobel-Jørgensen
>> *Cc:* PETSc [petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov]
>> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex problem
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Morten Nobel-Jørgensen <
...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 09, 2016 12:21 PM
> *To:* Morten Nobel-Jørgensen
> *Cc:* PETSc [petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov]
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex problem
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Morten Nobel-Jørgensen <m...@dtu.dk>
> wrote:
&g
From: Matthew Knepley [knep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2016 12:21 PM
To: Morten Nobel-Jørgensen
Cc: PETSc [petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov]
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex problem
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Morten Nobel-Jørgensen
<m...@dtu.dk<mailto:m...@dtu.dk>> wrote
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Mark Lohry wrote:
> Regarding DMPlex, I'm unclear on the separation between Index Sets and
> Plex for unstructured solvers. I've got an existing unstructured serial
> solver using petsc's newton-krylov
>
Index Sets are lists of integers.
Regarding DMPlex, I'm unclear on the separation between Index Sets and
Plex for unstructured solvers. I've got an existing unstructured serial
solver using petsc's newton-krylov solvers. Should I be looking to
parallelize this via IS or plex? Is there an interface for either that
allows me to
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Morten Nobel-Jørgensen wrote:
> Dear PETSc developers and users,
>
> Last week we posted a question regarding an error with DMPlex and multiple
> dofs and have not gotten any feedback yet. This is uncharted waters for us,
> since we have gotten used
Dear PETSc developers and users,
Last week we posted a question regarding an error with DMPlex and multiple dofs
and have not gotten any feedback yet. This is uncharted waters for us, since we
have gotten used to an extremely fast feedback from the PETSc crew. So - with
the chance of sounding
13 matches
Mail list logo