Ok, thanks. From the PETSc side of things this doesn't tell us anything new
but does show the "missing" time in the solver (attached).
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Bhalla, Amneet Pal S
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
>>
>> Also getting the results
And the PETSc log summary for comparison
*** WIDEN YOUR WINDOW TO 120 CHARACTERS. Use 'enscript -r
-fCourier9' to print this document***
**
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Griffith, Boyce Eugene
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Griffith, Boyce Eugene
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
Matt is right,
On Jan 14, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Barry Smith
mailto:bsm...@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Griffith, Boyce Eugene
mailto:boy...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Barry Smith
mailto:bsm...@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
Matt is right, there is a lot of "missing" time
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Griffith, Boyce Eugene
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> Matt is right, there is a lot of "missing" time from the output. Please
>> send the output from -ksp_view so we can see exactly what solver is being
>> used.
>
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>
> Matt is right, there is a lot of "missing" time from the output. Please
> send the output from -ksp_view so we can see exactly what solver is being
> used.
>
> From the output we have:
>
>Nonlinear solver 78 % of the time (so
Matt is right, there is a lot of "missing" time from the output. Please send
the output from -ksp_view so we can see exactly what solver is being used.
From the output we have:
Nonlinear solver 78 % of the time (so your "setup code" outside of PETSC is
taking about 22% of the time)
On Jan 14, 2016, at 8:44 AM, Matthew Knepley
mailto:knep...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dave May
mailto:dave.mayhe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 14 January 2016 at 14:24, Matthew Knepley
mailto:knep...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Bhalla, Amneet Pal
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dave May wrote:
>
>
> On 14 January 2016 at 14:24, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Bhalla, Amneet Pal S <
>> amne...@live.unc.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you mail us a -
On 14 January 2016 at 14:24, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Bhalla, Amneet Pal S <
> amne...@live.unc.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>
>> Can you mail us a -log_summary for a rough cut? Sometimes its hard
>> to interpret th
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Bhalla, Amneet Pal S wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> Can you mail us a -log_summary for a rough cut? Sometimes its hard
> to interpret the data avalanche from one of those tools without a simple
> map.
>
>
> Does this indicat
On Jan 13, 2016, at 9:17 PM, Griffith, Boyce Eugene
mailto:boy...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
I see one hot spot:
Here is with opt build
*** WIDEN YOUR WINDOW TO 12
Thanks! That worked for me.
On Jan 13, 2016, at 10:05 PM, Justin Chang
mailto:jychan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
HPCToolkit for MacOSX doesn't require any installation.
Just go to:
http://hpctoolkit.org/download/hpcviewer/
and download this file:
hpctraceviewer-5.4.2-r20160111-macosx.cocoa.x86_64.
HPCToolkit for MacOSX doesn't require any installation.
Just go to:
http://hpctoolkit.org/download/hpcviewer/
and download this file:
hpctraceviewer-5.4.2-r20160111-macosx.cocoa.x86_64.zip
Important note: be sure to unzip the file via the terminal, not with
Finder. It may screw up the GUI. On
I see one hot spot:
On Jan 14, 2016, at 12:12 AM, Bhalla, Amneet Pal S
mailto:amne...@live.unc.edu>> wrote:
##
##
# WARNING!!!
On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Matthew Knepley
mailto:knep...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Can you mail us a -log_summary for a rough cut? Sometimes its hard
to interpret the data avalanche from one of those tools without a simple map.
Does this indicate some hot spots?
*
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Bhalla, Amneet Pal S
wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am trying to profile my application code that uses a lot of PETSc
> solvers. I am running applications on OS X - Yosemite. I am thinking
> of using HPCToolKit for the purpose, but could not find a dmg package for
> t
Hi Folks,
I am trying to profile my application code that uses a lot of PETSc solvers. I
am running applications on OS X - Yosemite. I am thinking
of using HPCToolKit for the purpose, but could not find a dmg package for that.
I have access to a remote linux machine that has HPCToolkit
and HPCV
18 matches
Mail list logo
