Re: [petsc-users] Newton line search options

2022-07-29 Thread Tang, Qi
Thanks, Lawrence. I did see that book. Is nleqerr generally better than bt or l2? I seem to see someone claims that. Qi On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:27 PM, Lawrence Mitchell wrote:  On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 18:36, Tang, Qi mailto:tan...@msu.edu>> wrote: Thanks, Matt. This one is very helpful

Re: [petsc-users] Newton line search options

2022-07-29 Thread Lawrence Mitchell
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 18:36, Tang, Qi wrote: > Thanks, Matt. This one is very helpful > There's also the Deuflhard book on the affine covariant linesearch (snes_linesearch_type nleqerr) Lawrence >

Re: [petsc-users] Newton line search options

2022-07-29 Thread Tang, Qi
Thanks, Matt. This one is very helpful On Jul 29, 2022, at 9:24 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:  On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:16 PM Tang, Qi mailto:tan...@msu.edu>> wrote: Hi, Is there some in depth review on different options related to line search of snes newtonls? Our solvers are sensitive to

Re: [petsc-users] Newton line search options

2022-07-29 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:16 PM Tang, Qi wrote: > Hi, > > Is there some in depth review on different options related to line search > of snes newtonls? Our solvers are sensitive to the choices there, and I > could not understand why one works better than the other or how to tune > those options.

[petsc-users] Newton line search options

2022-07-28 Thread Tang, Qi
Hi, Is there some in depth review on different options related to line search of snes newtonls? Our solvers are sensitive to the choices there, and I could not understand why one works better than the other or how to tune those options. Thanks. Qi