"Smith, Barry F. via petsc-users" writes:
>You need to run it on more processors, this one processor doesn't have
> enough memory to fit the vectors (which by the way are huge 1,614,907,707,076)
This is just a tridiagonal problem; I don't know why the vectors would
be huge when the problem
No
> On Nov 29, 2018, at 8:54 PM, Fazlul Huq wrote:
>
> Sorry! I made mistake in running the code.
>
> It's actually working now until matrix size of 999!
>
> But when I try to extend to one order more it give me error message:
> ***
> On Nov 29, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Fazlul Huq wrote:
>
> So, if I try to run the same code in a super computer then I can run with
> even larger matrix?
Within reason. But every time you increase n by 10 it will require more than
100 times as much memory so even on the biggest machine you ar
Sorry! I made mistake in running the code.
It's actually working now until matrix size of 999!
But when I try to extend to one order more it give me error message:
**
Out of
You need to run it on more processors, this one processor doesn't have
enough memory to fit the vectors (which by the way are huge 1,614,907,707,076)
Barry
> On Nov 29, 2018, at 8:26 PM, Fazlul Huq wrote:
>
> Thanks.
>
> I have configured with 64-bit and then when I run, I got the f
> On Nov 29, 2018, at 1:46 PM, Fazlul Huq via petsc-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello PETSc Developers,
>
> I am trying to run the code (attached herewith) with the following command
> and it works until the size of the matrix is 9X9. But when I try to
> run with 99X99 then I got we
Hello PETSc Developers,
I am trying to run the code (attached herewith) with the following command
and it works until the size of the matrix is 9X9. But when I try to
run with 99X99 then I got weird result.
The command is:
./poisson_m -n 99 -pc_type hypre -pc_hypre_type boomer
