> On Jun 26, 2023, at 5:12 PM, Srikanth Sathyanarayana
> wrote:
>
> Dear Barry and Mark,
>
> Thank you very much for your response.
>
>>>The allocation for what?
> What I mean is that, we don’t want additional memory allocations through DMDA
> Vectors. I am not sure if it is even
Let me backup a bit.
I think you have an application that has a Cartesian, or a least fine, grid
and you "have to implement a block structured grid approach".
Is this block structured solver well developed?
We have support for block structured (quad-tree) grids you might want to
use. This is a
> On Jun 26, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Srikanth Sathyanarayana
> wrote:
>
> Dear PETSc developers,
>
>
> I am currently working on a Gyrokinetic code where I essentially have to
> implement a block structured grid approach in one of the subdomains of the
> phase space coordinates. I have
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 11:44 AM Srikanth Sathyanarayana
wrote:
> Dear PETSc developers,
>
>
> I am currently working on a Gyrokinetic code where I essentially have to
> implement a block structured grid approach in one of the subdomains of
> the phase space coordinates. I have attached one such
Dear PETSc developers,
I am currently working on a Gyrokinetic code where I essentially have to
implement a block structured grid approach in one of the subdomains of
the phase space coordinates. I have attached one such example in the x -
v_parallel subdomains where I go from a full grid to
