Re: [petsc-users] use MATSEQAIJMKL in 64-bit indices

2023-10-20 Thread Di Miao
Thanks, it worked. Di On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:52 PM Satish Balay wrote: > Try using the additional option --with-64-bit-blas-indices=1 > > Satish > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023, Di Miao wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I found that when compiled with '--with-64-bit-indices=1' option, the > > following three

Re: [petsc-users] use MATSEQAIJMKL in 64-bit indices

2023-10-20 Thread Satish Balay via petsc-users
Try using the additional option --with-64-bit-blas-indices=1 Satish On Fri, 20 Oct 2023, Di Miao wrote: > Hi, > > I found that when compiled with '--with-64-bit-indices=1' option, the > following three definitions in petscconf.h will be removed: > > #define PETSC_HAVE_MKL_SPARSE 1 > #define PE

[petsc-users] use MATSEQAIJMKL in 64-bit indices

2023-10-20 Thread Di Miao
Hi, I found that when compiled with '--with-64-bit-indices=1' option, the following three definitions in petscconf.h will be removed: #define PETSC_HAVE_MKL_SPARSE 1 #define PETSC_HAVE_MKL_SPARSE_OPTIMIZE 1 #define PETSC_HAVE_MKL_SPARSE_SP2M_FEATURE 1 I believe mkl can also use 64-bit indices (l