On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:13:55PM -0800, Ben Lovett wrote:
All in all, I'm seeing a great improvement. My connection is ADSL
1.5M/384, and the sweet spot for my connection appears to be 330Kbit/s.
I'll do some more playing around with it tomorrow to see if I can get
better speeds, but
nevermind, I figured it out. I needed to add another rdr rule.
My interpretation was that you could only forward one port per machine
running NAT, but I tried it out and I guess it's forward one port per
nat'd interface. Anyone care to correct me?
--Bryan
On Sat, 2032-02-28 at 02:01, Bryan
Ignore this I guess it was cached...:-/
I shoulda checked that...*grumble*
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 10:06, Bryan Irvine wrote:
nevermind, I figured it out. I needed to add another rdr rule.
My interpretation was that you could only forward one port per machine
running NAT, but I tried it
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:21:55 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:13:55PM -0800, Ben Lovett wrote:
All in all, I'm seeing a great improvement. My connection is ADSL
1.5M/384, and the sweet spot for my connection appears to be 330Kbit/s.
I'll do some
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:29:19PM +, siivv wrote:
Is a connection with the checkpoint secureremote client possible through a
obsd 3.2 nat'd pf firewall? I am refering to an outbound connection from
my home network, through the pf fwall, and to the checkpoint fwall
How about more
