RE: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-09 Thread Primo Gabrijeli
Trevor Talbot wrote ... I did some playing around and discovered something. It seems that someone forgot to fully ALTQify tun0. Specifically, select() always returns read-ready if there's any data in the internal queue, whether ALTQ's discipline is ready to release it or not. The

ftp-proxy without nat

2003-06-09 Thread Nick Lomonte
I'm running PF as a routing firewall without NAT. Unless I'm mistaken, ftp-proxy should work in either direction without having the reverse patch in this situation. Am I wrong in this assumption? It works fine for local ftp clients, but I can't seem to get it to work in the other direction.

OpenBSD Bridge setup with OSPF routed networks behind it - W0ES -

2003-06-09 Thread Jason Houx
{2600}--- |--- /29 || fxp0 { OpenBSD } fxp1 --| { Bridge }| eth0 { Cisco 2514 } eth1 --|

Re: ftp-proxy without nat - fixed

2003-06-09 Thread Nick Lomonte
Nevermind, I got it. Had to add some rules to pass traffic from the external interface to 127.0.0.1 On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 13:22, Nick Lomonte wrote: I'm running PF as a routing firewall without NAT. Unless I'm mistaken, ftp-proxy should work in either direction without having the reverse

pf round-robin load balancing patent issue

2003-06-09 Thread Charles Steaderman
Hi all. I am involved with a project to provide load balanced, redundent links to the internet. We have been approached by the holder's of Patent 6,493,341 indicating that we are in violation of their patent. It appears that the patent covers identifying a SYN packet and picking a line over

Re: pf round-robin load balancing patent issue

2003-06-09 Thread Henning Brauer
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:06:17PM -0500, Charles Steaderman wrote: Hi all. I am involved with a project to provide load balanced, redundent links to the internet. We have been approached by the holder's of Patent 6,493,341 indicating that we are in violation of their patent. It appears

Re: pf round-robin load balancing patent issue

2003-06-09 Thread Wouter Clarie
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Henning Brauer wrote: would help if we had access to the patent. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFd=PALLp=1u=/netahtml/srchnum.htmr=1f=Gl=50s1=6,493,341.WKU.OS=PN/6,493,341RS=PN/6,493,341

Re: pf round-robin load balancing patent issue

2003-06-09 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:30:10AM +0200, Wouter Clarie wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Henning Brauer wrote: would help if we had access to the patent.

Samba + OpenBSD VPN

2003-06-09 Thread David Dellanave
I am cross-posting this to openbsd-pf because I am at a complete loss and don't know where the problem lies. I have a OpenBSD ipsec vpn setup between several node sites and one central site. For the most part it seems they are setup fine (isakmpd, pf etc). I can ping, I can do all sorts of