Re: route-to on IPv6

2003-06-24 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:45:47PM +0900, KOZUKA Masahiro wrote: pass in on fxp1 route-to (fxp0 fe80::1) from 3ffe:::::/16 to !fe80::/16 The route-to argument is meant to be the address of the next hop (usable for an arp lookup, for instance). Using a link-local address there has no

Re: route-to on IPv6

2003-06-24 Thread Henning Brauer
Sumary: 1. modify dst, if it is a linklocal address. Because on KAME implementation, 4th octet must be set to scpeid(if_index), I think:) 2. change (*ifp-if_output) to nd6_output. I just commited your diff with a minor change from itojun - thanks! -- Henning Brauer, BS Web Services,

Happy Birthday

2003-06-24 Thread Max Laier
From: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/pf.c Revision 1.1 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Sun Jun 24 19:48:58 2001 UTC (23 months, 4 weeks ago) by kjell 2 years! All the best for the future!

Re: limit bandwidth each node

2003-06-24 Thread j knight
Ganbaa wrote: Hi All, I want to limit bandwidth each node on the backbone. I don't know how to configure pf. Anybody, who know to configure pf, please give me advice. Ganbaa, what happened to that marvelously detailed email you sent me in private? That was an excellent problem report. You'll

Re: Bridge Weird Problem

2003-06-24 Thread Kenny Gryp
Yes, i've got some BAD state messages. Some of them: Jun 24 22:19:55 firewall /bsd: pf: BAD state: TCP 212.123.18.196:80 212.123.18.196:80 213.224.186.172:4004 [lo=2075491983 high=2075524103 win=1 modulator=0] [lo=133175873 high=133175874 win=32120 modulator=0] 4:2 PA seq=133175544

Re: Queing on ADSL ACK's

2003-06-24 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:43:50PM -0700, Trevor Talbot wrote: OpenBSD's ssh uses the old IPv4 TOS field, and sets it to lowdelay for interactive sessions. It only decides they're interactive after the initial connection setup and login. pf uses the priority queue for tos-lowdelay packets.