Re: Stupid Question

2003-07-11 Thread Trevor Talbot
On Thursday, Jul 10, 2003, at 18:38 US/Pacific, Aaron Suen wrote: Does anybody forsee a port, of some sorts, of pf for Windows? Yeah, it sounds a little wild, but I could really use something like this. I have a bunch of Windows clients on my home LAN, and you can never really trust the LAN (eve

Re: Stupid Question

2003-07-11 Thread Bryan Irvine
laffs, so I'm the one that fell in? aww man :-p --Bryan On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 11:06, Bryan Irvine wrote: > see the first line of the email > > "April 1, 2002" > > --Bryan > > On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 10:53, Jolan Luff wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:30:34PM -0400, Michael W . Lucas wrot

Re: Stupid Question

2003-07-11 Thread Sigfred HÃ¥versen
On Friday 11 July 2003 19:53, Jolan Luff wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:30:34PM -0400, Michael W . Lucas wrote: > > A port to Windows would not be feasible. And while I would not > > wish to speak for our esteemed developers, I think I'm fairly safe > > in saying that they would not be intere

Re: Stupid Question

2003-07-11 Thread Bryan Irvine
see the first line of the email "April 1, 2002" --Bryan On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 10:53, Jolan Luff wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:30:34PM -0400, Michael W . Lucas wrote: > > A port to Windows would not be feasible. And while I would not wish > > to speak for our esteemed developers, I think I

Re: Stupid Question

2003-07-11 Thread Jolan Luff
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:06:31AM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote: > see the first line of the email > > "April 1, 2002" it was a joke, referring to a joke...

Re: Stupid Question

2003-07-11 Thread Michael W . Lucas
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:53:25PM -0400, Jolan Luff wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:30:34PM -0400, Michael W . Lucas wrote: > > A port to Windows would not be feasible. And while I would not wish > > to speak for our esteemed developers, I think I'm fairly safe in > > saying that they would n

Re: Stupid Question

2003-07-11 Thread Jolan Luff
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:30:34PM -0400, Michael W . Lucas wrote: > A port to Windows would not be feasible. And while I would not wish > to speak for our esteemed developers, I think I'm fairly safe in > saying that they would not be interested in doing the work. :-) huh? i thought daniel was

Re: Stupid Question

2003-07-11 Thread Michael W . Lucas
Hi, A port to Windows would not be feasible. And while I would not wish to speak for our esteemed developers, I think I'm fairly safe in saying that they would not be interested in doing the work. :-) ==ml On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:38:26PM -0700, Aaron Suen wrote: > OK, so this is (may be, pr

ftp-proxy without inetd

2003-07-11 Thread Ron Rosson
Reposting here after not hearing anything on [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Original post 7/7/2003] With some goofing around this holiday weekend I was helping my oldest teenager with some things and we noticed that his windows machines where unable to ftp. ( Damn thjings do not support PASSV ). So went an