Help prioritizing traffic

2003-10-04 Thread Elijah Savage
All, I am on a DSL line 1.5/768 and have setup prioritizing acks which works great for me. But now that I have started sharing my connection with my next door neighbor and charging him for it and he does a lot of ftp downloads. So off of my firewall I added another interface dropped the access

Re: OpenBSD 3.0 and the recent pf vulnerability

2003-10-04 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:55:57PM +0100, Jorden Verwer wrote: > I'm running a firewall based on OpenBSD 3.0 with pf and scrub enabled. I'd > prefer to keep things this way, because they work. However, with the recent > DoS vulnerability I've become a bit less certain about my firewall's > securit

OpenBSD 3.0 and the recent pf vulnerability

2003-10-04 Thread Jorden Verwer
Hi all, I'm running a firewall based on OpenBSD 3.0 with pf and scrub enabled. I'd prefer to keep things this way, because they work. However, with the recent DoS vulnerability I've become a bit less certain about my firewall's security. Is OpenBSD 3.0 affected by this vulnerability? I know it's a

Re: pf_norm patches for 3.3-stable and 3.2-stable

2003-10-04 Thread Uwe Dippel
Daniel, Thanks for the info. I only became aware when the 007-patch was announced and showed up on OpenBSD-Errata. There was no announcement by Todd and none on OpenBSD-Errata. Picking up the 007, I also saw 006 and applied both. Imagine my shock when I read that 006 had been withdrawn. I imagined

pf_norm patches for 3.3-stable and 3.2-stable

2003-10-04 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
The problem was reported around Aug 28. -current was fixed Aug 29 with pf_norm.c 1.75, which is included in 3.4-release. Backported patches against 3.3-stable and 3.2-stable were sent out shortly after, but required testing. They were commited to their respective branches Sep 24. I'm not allowed

006_pfnorm.patch ???

2003-10-04 Thread duncan
006_pfnorm.patch What happened to the pfnorm patch??? Around 08h13 MST, I saw up on the openbsd/patches/3.3/common/ on sunsite.ualberta.ca, sometime later that day it was removed, why??