PF/spamd oddity

2004-03-17 Thread Jason Dixon
Perhaps I simply need some sleep, but I'm confused as to why my test isn't working as expected. I'm trying to test a connection from a entry (my other box, 192.168.0.58) to my new mailserver (192.168.0.53). I have the requisite spamd table, rdr to localhost, and pass on loopback entries in p

Re: Another clue why pf didn't meet goal in first test

2004-03-17 Thread Greg Hennessy
On 16 Mar 2004 04:33:09 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Hansson) wrote: >> i know, some must see that i've turned into an HFSC _whore_ and >> would likely use it to make nutritous and delicious milkshakes in >> the morning if i could , but it is enjoyable. > >Well, your advice to me hav

Re: Keeping a lot of states

2004-03-17 Thread Paul B. Henson
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Jedi/Sector One wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:24:36PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote: > > We're running an X86 box with 512MB ram, nmbclusters = 8192, nkmempages = > > 81920 > > Didn't Cedric say that nkmempages > 16384 on x86 was instable? > Did you test it that way fo