On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:56:41PM -0400, Jim Zajkowski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have any experience with the number of rules a bridge can
> handle? We're thinking about how our wireless network policy, and we'd
> like to filter by MA
Hi all,
Seems our 3.5 firewall becomes totally unresponsive at around 50,000
state table entries, despite a 200,00 state table limit. As soon as I
clear the state table, the firewall immediately recovers. I've been told
there is a patch or series of patches that can remedy this behavior. Are
they
Nick Holland wrote:
..
> You don't like the (good) answers you got on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my appologies, that was uncalled for.
the fact that *I* didn't read any pf list messages this yet this
morning doesn't mean they have just arrived. *sigh*
Nick.
--
http://www.holland-consulting.net
Sean wrote:
Hi all,
Seems our 3.5 firewall becomes totally unresponsive at around 50,000
state table entries, despite a 200,00 state table limit. As soon as I
clear the state table, the firewall immediately recovers. I've been told
there is a patch or series of patches that can remedy this behavior
Sean wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Seems our 3.5 firewall becomes totally unresponsive at around 50,000
> state table entries, despite a 200,00 state table limit. As soon as I
> clear the state table, the firewall immediately recovers. I've been told
> there is a patch or series of patches that can reme
> Seems our 3.5 firewall becomes totally unresponsive at around 50,000
> state table entries, despite a 200,00 state table limit. As soon as I
> clear the state table, the firewall immediately recovers. I've been told
> there is a patch or series of patches that can remedy this behavior. Are
> they
Tyson E Lefebvre wrote:
>>
> You already posted this misc@ and they told you what to do. You're
> setting NMBCLUSTERS and you shouldn't. Follow the advice of misc@ and
> you will be fine.
>
Those responses came after I posted here. Thanks for the reply, though.
Sean
