* Ken Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-21 12:17]:
> Henning Brauer [20/08/04 22:35 +0200]:
> > * Ken Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-20 22:28]:
> > > Is there way in pf to move a particular TCP connection from one
> > > queue to another -- while the connection is still live? I don't
> > >
On 21 Aug 2004 01:32:43 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken
Simpson) wrote:
>> > Is there any hard and fast reason why the queue can't go slower than
>> > 5.59Kb?
>>
>> timer resolution.
>
>So then perhaps I should have asked: Is there a way to make a
>connection move more slowly than 5.59Kbps using pf
* Ken Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-21 12:17]:
> > > Is there any hard and fast reason why the queue can't go slower than
> > > 5.59Kb?
> >
> > timer resolution.
>
> So then perhaps I should have asked: Is there a way to make a
> connection move more slowly than 5.59Kbps using pf?
yes, qu
Hi folks-
Just got my new 4501, having a great time using Chris' flashdist and
nsh on it. I've made some minor changes to include cron/crontab, in
order to have pf use syslogd
(http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/logging.html#syslog) for remote
logging. However, it seems I'm having some problems g
* Ken Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-20 22:28]:
> I recently tried to set up a 10 bit per second queue and got the
> following error:
>
> pfctl: queue bandwidth must be larger than 5.59Kb
>
> My pf.conf looked like this:
>
> # Set up a default and slow queue.
> altq on $ext_if bandwidth
On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 01:38, Mike Frantzen wrote:
> > * we are not using scrub rules.
> > Does anyone have any ideas as to why these fragments are not being
> > covered by the state mechanisms?
>
> because "keep state" doesn't track fragments. scrub does.
Yes, using scrub fixed the problem
* Ken Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-20 22:28]:
> Is there way in pf to move a particular TCP connection from one
> queue to another -- while the connection is still live? I don't
> imagine it would be really difficult; isn't it just a case of changing
> an entry in the state table?
no, the
Henning Brauer [20/08/04 22:35 +0200]:
> * Ken Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-20 22:28]:
> > Is there way in pf to move a particular TCP connection from one
> > queue to another -- while the connection is still live? I don't
> > imagine it would be really difficult; isn't it just a case of c
> > Is there any hard and fast reason why the queue can't go slower than
> > 5.59Kb?
>
> timer resolution.
So then perhaps I should have asked: Is there a way to make a
connection move more slowly than 5.59Kbps using pf? And if not, how
could that feature be added to pf?
TTUL
Ken
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:21:46PM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
> Is there way in pf to move a particular TCP connection from one
> queue to another -- while the connection is still live? I don't
> imagine it would be really difficult; isn't it just a case of changing
> an entry in the state table?
10 matches
Mail list logo