On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:57:26PM +0100, messmate wrote:
> But WHERE can i get a recent documentation about PF ??
The official PF User's Guide is an excellent start:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html
There's a french translation, too:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/fr/index.html
Da
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:39:53 +0100
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-07
>19:59]:> On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, messmate wrote:
>> > pass in quick on $internal proto tcp from $TRUST_IP to any port =
>22> > flags S keep state
>> remove the = sign
>> pa
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:11:08PM +0100, messmate wrote:
> "pass in on vr0 inet proto tcp from any to 192.168.12.15 port = 3128
> keep state" and
> "pass out on tun0 inet proto tcp from any to any port = www keep
> state"
> The rules here above seems ok.
> But this rule :
> # Autorise SSH
> "
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:17:42PM -0300, Fernando Braga wrote:
> fmbraga:783$ sudo pfctl -a authpf -sA
> authpf/f_neus(16509)
The full anchor name is literally 'authpf/f_neus(16509)', consisting of
authpf, the user name and the pid, including the slash and the
parentheses, try
$ sudo pfctl -a
Hi,
I'm using OpenBSD 3.6-release, just installed.
I want to view authpf rules loaded for one of my users. Have been trying
this:
fmbraga:782$ sudo pfctl -sA
authpf
fmbraga:783$ sudo pfctl -a authpf -sA
authpf/f_neus(16509)
fmbraga:784$ sudo pfctl -a authpf/f_neus -sr
pfctl: DIOCGETRULES: Inval
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if the following makes sense:
>
> altq on $ext_if cbq bandwidth $caudal_subida queue \
> { prioridad_7, prioridad_6, prioridad_5, prioridad_1 }
> queue prioridad_7 bandwidth 60% priority 7 cbq(red, borrow)
> queue prioridad_6 bandwidth 60% prior
Hi all,
can anybody explain what's the difference bewteen the syntax ( sign '=')
between this rules :
"pass in on vr0 inet proto tcp from any to 192.168.12.15 port = 3128
keep state" and
"pass out on tun0 inet proto tcp from any to any port = www keep
state"
The rules here above seems ok.
But th
Hi,
I have being all the afternoon playing arround with ALTQ and I have finally
done this configuration, I have a couple of doubts that I dont know if they
make sense, first is the ALTQ percentages (check another message), my
question is mainly regarding who ALTQ works.
My problem is... with th
Hi,
I was wondering if the following makes sense:
altq on $ext_if cbq bandwidth $caudal_subida queue \
{ prioridad_7, prioridad_6, prioridad_5, prioridad_1 }
queue prioridad_7 bandwidth 60% priority 7 cbq(red, borrow)
queue prioridad_6 bandwidth 60% priority 6 cbq(red, borro
> I am trying to configure a simple firewall with nat and altq bandwidth
> control to limit some services (emule) and give higher priority to other
> services (web, dns and email).
>
> What am I doing wrong?, emule sucks all the available bandwidth and adsl
> line is unsusable. As you can see I hav
Hello Mario,
you could try a few things in order to limit the incoming/outgoing
bandwidth for your network.
You can easily limit your outgoing bandwidth, but there is a problem
with incoming (downstream) bandwidth control.
If you run e-mule on any machine in your local network (not the
gateway
> At 11.55 08/11/2004, you wrote:
> > > [router]-->[ext_if]-->[inf_if]-->[LAN]
> > > bridge
> > >
> > > Should I only apply queueing on the ext_if?
> >
> >The problem is when datas are knocking at the door of a NIC, they're
> >already here, and it's too late to preserve ban
Clears things up. Moved list to a table and all works as expected.
Thanks
SM
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Hartmeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 8:43 PM
To: Maat, Steve
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RDR rule for ftp-proxy
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 05:
Hi,
I am trying to configure a simple firewall with nat and altq bandwidth
control to limit some services (emule) and give higher priority to other
services (web, dns and email).
What am I doing wrong?, emule sucks all the available bandwidth and adsl
line is unsusable. As you can see I have tr
14 matches
Mail list logo
