On Wednesday 24 November 2004 21:32, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Marcos Biscaysaqu - ThePacific.net wrote:
> > Do you know if work on freebsd?
>
> Not sure.
>
> The two most important parts are:
> - recursive anchors (appeared in OpenBSD 3.6). Maybe Max knows when those
> when i
Hi there.
Great work my friend!.
Working on it to make it work on freebsd as sonner as possible.
thanks
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Marcos Biscaysaqu - ThePacific.net wrote:
Do you know if work on freebsd?
Not sure.
The two most important parts are:
-
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Marcos Biscaysaqu - ThePacific.net wrote:
> Do you know if work on freebsd?
Not sure.
The two most important parts are:
- recursive anchors (appeared in OpenBSD 3.6). Maybe Max knows when those
when into FreeBSD?
- libevent > 0.8 (from ports/devel/libevent)
Anything el
Hi There.
This is a great news!!!
Do you know if work on freebsd?
Thanks
Marcos Biscaysaqu
Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
Ok, bleeding edge pf people... I wrote a new FTP proxy called "pftpx" and
I'd like to solicit some feedback from the community...
Why should you try it? What advantages does pftpx
Ok, bleeding edge pf people... I wrote a new FTP proxy called "pftpx" and
I'd like to solicit some feedback from the community...
Why should you try it? What advantages does pftpx offer?
1) it handles all ftp modes: PORT, PASV, EPRT, EPSV
2) it handles ipv6
3) it should scale: one process hand
> Stateful inspection on gateway can hamper tcp-connections, when
> inbound or outbound packets goes another route (i.e. when one of
> directions not goes thru gateway).
well, yeah. How is a firewall supposed to deduce state if it doesn't
see any replies? psychic deduction?
>
> Connection wo
Hi Eldar,
Guess i was not being clear.
pfsync has been allowed on the dedicated interface in this case is fxp2.
Cheers,
Edy
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 14:01, Eldar N. Novruzov wrote:
> man pfsync
>
> "pf(4) must also be configured to allow pfsync and carp(4) traffic
> through. The following
