Maybe you could chain multiple dup-to boxes togeather, or chain several
interfaces on one box? I don't know a thing about dup-to, but it seems like
it might work.
_
--|A|--[ destination 1 ]
|
-
|B|--[ destination 2 ]
|
-
|C|--[ destination 3 ]
> >Maybe you can to use multicast address as destination.
>
> Unfortunately dup-to requires you to specify a physical network
> interface for where to send the traffic to. You can specify an
> address associated with that network interface, but I'm not really
> sure what benefit this has because
Thought I would reply to multiple responses in one post to cut down on noise...
> I do not believe that this will work, as only the last matching rule
> (or first matching rule that has 'quick') is used.
Yes, this was my gut feeling too, but I have been unable to find any
validation of this in th
The error message was misleading.
I got wrong spelling of the word bandwidth.
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:00:02 +0200, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
why do i get
pfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent "root_tun0"
/etc/pf.conf:15: syntax error
for:
altq on $ext_if cbq bandw
Maybe you can to use multicast address as destination.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:55:38 -0500, Matt Van Mater
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to aggregate traffic coming in on several interfaces into one
'pool' of traffic and then send a copy of this traffic to multiple
hosts. I don't know if th
Hello all,
why do i get
pfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent "root_tun0"
/etc/pf.conf:15: syntax error
for:
altq on $ext_if cbq bandwidth 96Kb queue {high, med, low, p2p}
queue high bandwidth 60% priority 7 cbq(borrow)
queue med bandwidth 20% priority 4 cbq(default, borrow)
queu
