Greetings,
In trying to diagnose a problem with ftp-proxy, I stumbled upon
something with pf's rdr that I cannot explain.
Assume a simple firewall ruleset. I had the following rdr line:
rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any \
port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 2121
That line, along with t
I have a system with two ISPs coming in on fxp1 and fxp2. All mail is supposed
to be handled through a static IP on fxp1. The ruleset is designed to nat all
smtp traffic going out through this public IP, and to forward all incoming smtp
to the mail server.
In the special case where mail originates
I have a host behind a pair of carp/pfsync machines. It used to be
10.100.81.183, but I moved it behind the firewalls and put 10.100.81.183 on
each firewall as carp2 (see below). When trying to connect to
www.openbsd.org, I get the following...
Mar 15 14:38:06.257369 rule 0/0(match): block in on x
On Mar 15, 2005, at 12:20 AM, Sean Kamath wrote:
[In a message on Wed, 02 Mar 2005 05:34:20 GMT,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:]
In my case, I'm running a SS20 with le* interfaces, which means that
all interfaces use the same ethernet address.
I'm curious, doesn't setting local-mac-address? to true do
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:19, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > So, I guess that leaves the question, can one change the ethernet
> > address of a NIC with ifconfig on OpenBSD?
>
> no.
Yet.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=111073781926839&w=2
* Sean Kamath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 06:40]:
> So, I guess that leaves the question, can one change the ethernet
> address of a NIC with ifconfig on OpenBSD?
no.
--
Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix is very simple, but it takes a
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:33:02 +, Ryan McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:50:23PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > Could Someone please tell me the advantages of PF against Firewalls
> > using the ASIC technology in terms of Security and perfomance??
>
> If there is a b
