In our organization, I'd like to use Altq to keep any one process
(download or whatever) from hogging bandwidth and degrading
performance for others. It's more complicated than I expected, though,
and I haven't been able to find an example that's much like my
environment (I'd be glad to publish min
Hi Tim,
I have been running asterisk behind an OpenBSD 3.x firewall for two years
now.
It was a pain to get it working due to the fact that I didn't know much
about SIP and RTP at that time.
There are basically one problem to get this working and it's because the
private IP of the asterisk server
Tim,
What are you using asterisk for, SIP? What are the rules you have now?
What is exactly the problem?
Quoting Tim Pushor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No ideas?
>
> Even though most are using asterisk behind a nat with simple port
> forwarding, it looks like I am unable to do this with pf. I have g
I've been trying i bit more since I wrote the first mail. I've been
talking in the phone for about an hour now - with full upload (approx 10
torrent seeding from 2 computers i the LAN), and the conversation was
close to perfect, I would say.
The interesting bit now is to see if anybody else get
My previous reply was cut by some unknown reason, let me try again.
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Henrik Gustafsson wrote:
Hi!
As a response to an idea posted in pf@ the other day I wrote this
utility for removing pf table entries based on their age. It has now
been somewhat tested and updated, and
On 09:14, Wed 29 Jun 05, Tim Pushor wrote:
> No ideas?
>
> Even though most are using asterisk behind a nat with simple port
> forwarding, it looks like I am unable to do this with pf. I have grown
> to love pf so much it would be a shame to have to dump it on MY network :-(
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
At 08:14 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote:
No ideas?
Even though most are using asterisk behind a nat with simple port
forwarding, it looks like I am unable to do this with pf. I have grown to
love pf so much it would be a shame to have to dump it on MY network :-(
I've been tinkering with asterisk a
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 11:14 am, Tim Pushor wrote:
> The long and short of it is that I'd really like NAT a subset of
> traffic, without putting the connection in the translation table. That
> is, I want to translate the source ip:port on the outbound, but not
> worry about return traffic (since
