Well, I have tested a bit more, including DFBSD. Although it handled the
traffic with limits a bit better (otoh, the computer was much slower - p2
333, so it might have had some influence), it still had problems. Option HZ
bumped to 1000 (as is recommended in most cases, when altq is in question
On 08/21/2006 02:04:02 PM, Steve Chinatti wrote:
Won't that be an issue for the firewall? It would RDR the packet in
order to change the destination address to 192.168.x.x (for a packet
destined for the tunnel), but the firewall also has routes to the
internal network for those addresses.
I t
Won't that be an issue for the firewall? It would RDR the packet in order to
change the destination address to 192.168.x.x (for a packet destined for the
tunnel), but the firewall also has routes to the internal network for those
addresses. I would think that it wouldn't be able to differentia
