> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 07:57:33AM -0400, David Hill wrote:
>
>> I reloaded the rules manually with pfctl -F rules -f /etc/pf.conf after
>> removing set skip on sis0. Nat still did not work. Rebooting fixed it.
>
> Can you try the diff below (against pfctl only,
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 03:38:10PM -0400, David Hill wrote:
>
>> set skip on sis0
>>
>> nat on sis0 inet from 10.0.0.0/8 to any -> 216.x.x.x
>> pass quick all
>>
>> nat does not work.
>
> Of course not. You didn't expect it to, did you?
>
Hello -
I am running -current as of July 7.
If I boot with pf enabled, and have the following rules..
set skip on sis0
nat on sis0 inet from 10.0.0.0/8 to any -> 216.x.x.x
pass quick all
nat does not work. If I remove "set skip on sis0", it still does not work.
Rebooting the machine with "se
> David Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> nat on sis0 inet from ! sis0:0 to any -> (sis0)
>
> This sounds a bit too inclusive for my tastes. I assume the address
> range your DHCP deamon uses is known as well as the fixed addreses, so
> why not u
Hello
I once used software by Cisco called BBSM. It nat'd both DHCP'd clients, as
well as clients that already had static IP's in place.
I am trying to copy this onto the OpenBSD platform.
Would the following work?
I have sis0 (ethernet) and ath0 (wireless). sis0 has a public IP address. sis0
