hi.
I have a question about NAT on bridge.
Network diagram:
[PPPoE clients 192.168.0.0/16 and real ip] <-->[PPPoE concetrator
80.0.0.1/29]<>[em0 FreeBSD bridge and NAT 80.0.0.2/29
em1]<->80.0.0.3/29[BGP Router]
Why bridge? Both PPPoE concentrator and BGP router are Cisco router
Hi.
There is example how to balance traffice on two isp
(http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html). I'm interestiong what rules
should be used for load balancing in situation where external network
interface and two gateways are in the same ip subnet and ip address of
external interface
Hi, all.
System is FreeBSD 6.2, it has two em[01] interfaces, there is a bridge between
them and on bridge0 there is NAT for internal adrresses (192.168.0.0/20), all
other packets are switched through bridge:
[PPPoE clients 192.168.0.0/20 and real ip]<--xDSL-->[PPPoE AC
80.0.0.1/29]<-->[em0 F
On Friday 13 July 2007 21:36:13 you wrote:
> On 07/09/2007 07:45:58 AM, Igor Popov wrote:
> > Bridge works, NAT works, but problems with ftp - control connection is
> >
> > established, but data connection is dropped. Of course, without
> > ftp-proxy
> > passive
Hi, all.
Simple question
Say, I have:
# ifconfig em1
em1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=4b
inet q broadcast 80.0.0.31
inet 80.0.0.28 netmask 0x broadcast 80.0.0.28
inet 80.0.0.29 netmask 0x broadcast 80.0.0.29
inet 80.0.0.30 netmask 0
Hi, all.
I have machine that works like bridge for external routing ip addresses and
NAT for range of rfc1918 addresses.
# uname -a
FreeBSD bignat.isp.ru 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Fri Sep 28 11:52:21
UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BIG_NAT amd64
# ifconfig
