On 1/1/06, Diana Eichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> damn I feel like I'm playing 20 questions.
>
> diana
And _still_ no pf.conf.
-ME
--
http://erdelynet.com/
Support OpenBSD! http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
On 31 Dec 2005 16:29:34 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope. No hostnames.
>
> Any other ideas?
Still no pf.conf, eh? Makes it hard to diagnose.
-ME
--
http://erdelynet.com/
Support OpenBSD! http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
On 31 Dec 2005 14:35:33 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a fairly uncomplicated pf.conf (which I'm willing to share if
> asked). When my OpenBSD 3.8 (but this also showed up on 3.7) box
> reboots, it ends up staying in "safe" mode (ssh enabled, no pings
> enabled), as
You've got a couple of weird things and errors on your page:
- You say OpenBSD doesn't support multiple consoles: ctrl+alt+f2
- Using the 3.7 ports tree on 3.6 is not recommended.
- tarring and untarring fake-i386 to install a port is just weird.
make install should already do that
- Why not i
The biggest problem I've run into with using DNS for pf rules is: when
PF is first loaded, there is a VERY restrictive ruleset (not allowing
NAT, etc). So if you've got a DNS server inside your firewall and
you're using rules based on DNS names of hosts that your DNS server is
not authoritative fo
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:02:47 -0600, J Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:38:05PM +0100, the unit calling itself Laurent
> Cheylus wrote:
> > To use VPN IPsec client with a NAT gateway like yours, VPN client must
> > use NAT-Traversal (ESP packets encapsulation in UDP pac
