On Wednesday 20 October 2004 00.06, Ed White wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 October 2004 22:08, Ed wrote:
> > Has anyone ported pf for use on linux kernels? I like the firewall so
> > much I want to use it on the debian systems.
>
> ..and maybe releasing it under GPL...
I think that GPL has ticked off mo
On Thursday 29 July 2004 13.05, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
>
> I agree with jared on this and would like to suggest that NAV running
> on the WinClient is the worst dumb POS I have ever had this misfortune
> to have to deal with. It can only do the most elementary smtp and pop
> transactions and fails
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 18.42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted the solution from add in pf.os, the fingerprint from W98 and
> Filezilla, it's possible ?
>
> My pf.conf:
>
> [...]
> block in quick from any os "unknown"
>
> [...]
>
You'll block more than you intended.
/Sigfred
On Thursday 18 March 2004 21.28, Kirk Ismay wrote:
> Slightly off topic, but has anyone ever seen 2 separate systems with
> the same MAC address? I thought this was a "never supposed to
> happen" kind of thing as MAC's are supposed to be globally unique.
> However, I've had this happen twice now w
On Saturday 13 December 2003 01:46, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:51:49AM +0200, Toni Riekkinen wrote:
> > What is the difference between using "scrub all reassemble tcp" and using
> > "modulate state" in incoming traffic rules, i.e for webserver in DMZ:
>
SNIP
> So, these a
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 08:51, Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
> I have lived a problem with Suse and Windows Servers. The problem is
> exactly the same with tne one detailed at
> http://www.benzedrine.cx/pf/msg03194.html. I have a mail server that is
> installed SUSE as OS with 2.4.19-4GB kernel and my
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 01:25, Mike Frantzen wrote:
> can you try this? one gentleman had this same problem and initially
> responded that this diff fixed it. i think he responded again later but
> i'm a few hundred emails behind right now (congrats, you were the first
> email in my inbox wh
On Monday 08 September 2003 22:59, Trevor Talbot wrote:
> On Monday, Sep 8, 2003, at 13:12 US/Pacific, Sigfred Håversen wrote:
> > Not sure if this should be reported as a bug or not, so please bear
> > with me.
> >
> > A "scrub on $ext_if reassemble tcp" will
Not sure if this should be reported as a bug or not, so please bear with me.
A "scrub on $ext_if reassemble tcp" will deny some SuSE clients access to some
Microsoft IIS webservers. This appears to be an issue with SuSE's latest
kernel (2.4.20-100) only.
I'm not sure it it's the IIS servers the
On Friday 11 July 2003 19:53, Jolan Luff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:30:34PM -0400, Michael W . Lucas wrote:
> > A port to Windows would not be feasible. And while I would not
> > wish to speak for our esteemed developers, I think I'm fairly safe
> > in saying that they would not be intere
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 19:45, Ed White wrote:
> On Monday 02 June 2003 21:24, Dries Schellekens wrote:
> > ttl Neither side of the connection is allowed to reduce
> > their IP TTL. An attacker may send a packet such that it reach- es
> > the firewall, affects the firewall state, and ex
11 matches
Mail list logo
