Thanks to all who responded.  I had already figured out that the pf nat
logs were included in the general pflogs -- I should have made that
clear but thanks to those who pointed it out anyway!

On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:10 -0500, Chris Green wrote:

> > One of the things that I am considering is to not bother with the NAT
> > logs at all but instead run Argus <www.qosient.com> on the inside
> > interface of the firewall.
> 
> That would be good enough for most cases.  You might also have luck with
> pfflowd logging to a netflow collector.
> 
> Please post what your eventual solution will be :)

I'll almost certainly go with Argus -- the alternatives are just too
complicated with the exception of pfflowd is an acceptable alternative.
I have just ordered a new box with a big disk to handle the logs.  I am
also considering writing a cgi script that will provide a simple query
interface (for those who live in fear of command lines :) to access the
argus logs.

Cheers, Russell.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to