Oh no problem. Thanks for clearing that up for me, I feel so much
better now that I know I'm not crazy. Also, I agree that Daniel did
make a good point that I hadn't thought about previously regarding the
internal users using the firewall for DNS, Proxy, etc. I am of the
mindset that these s
J. Sabino wrote:
Been reading a lot about pf recently, extremely nice software and love
the easy syntax and great features. Something however has me a bit
confused that I've read on this page:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#example
I'm trying to remember what I had in mind when I wro
Been reading a lot about pf recently, extremely nice software and love
the easy syntax and great features. Something however has me a bit
confused that I've read on this page:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#example
First, I've read that pf is configured by default with an implicit a
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 04:17:49PM -0400, J. Sabino wrote:
> First, I've read that pf is configured by default with an implicit allow
> all policy, I take that to mean that if you simply turn on pf and do not
> load any pf.conf file (filtering or nat rules, etc), the policy will
> allow everyth
