Re: Fix pf(4) nat proxy port allocation for manually specified ranges... perhaps?

2003-07-30 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 01:48:13AM -0700, Trevor Talbot wrote: > Ah, turns out this is a different bug. It's been fixed in -current, > but hasn't reached -stable. Yet. Again. Does someone not like Ryan > McBride's patches? :) > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/pfctl/ > pa

RE: Fix pf(4) nat proxy port allocation for manually specified ranges... perhaps? (Resolved)

2003-07-29 Thread Melameth, Daniel D.
On Sunday, July 27, 2003 9:54 AM, Daniel Melameth wrote: > The following snippets DO NOT work fine under 3.3 stable (on > similar > machine): > nat on $ext inet proto udp from $ipp port = 5004 to $ipc -> $ext > port 5004 nat on $ext inet proto udp from $ipp port = 5567 to $

RE: Fix pf(4) nat proxy port allocation for manually specified ranges... perhaps?

2003-07-27 Thread Melameth, Daniel D.
On Sunday, July 27, 2003 2:48 AM, Trevor Talbot wrote: The following snippets DO NOT work fine under 3.3 stable (on similar machine): >>> nat on $ext inet proto udp from $ipp port = 5004 to $ipc -> $ext port 5004 nat on $ext inet proto udp from $ipp port = 5567 to $ipc >>>

Re: Fix pf(4) nat proxy port allocation for manually specified ranges... perhaps?

2003-07-27 Thread Trevor Talbot
On Saturday, Jul 26, 2003, at 22:23 US/Pacific, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote: On Saturday, July 26, 2003 9:49 PM, Trevor Talbot wrote: The following snippets DO NOT work fine under 3.3 stable (on similar machine): nat on $ext inet proto udp from $ipp port = 5004 to $ipc -> $ext port 5004 nat o

RE: Fix pf(4) nat proxy port allocation for manually specified ranges... perhaps?

2003-07-26 Thread Melameth, Daniel D.
On Saturday, July 26, 2003 9:49 PM, Trevor Talbot wrote: > > Newbie running 3.3 stable with pf, dhcpd and isakmpd... > > > > ...recently upgraded to stable in the hopes of curing some ill that I > > have... and now I ask for peer review... > > > The following snippets DO NOT work fine under 3.3 st

Re: Fix pf(4) nat proxy port allocation for manually specified ranges... perhaps?

2003-07-26 Thread Trevor Talbot
On Saturday, Jul 26, 2003, at 19:55 US/Pacific, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote: Newbie running 3.3 stable with pf, dhcpd and isakmpd... ...recently upgraded to stable in the hopes of curing some ill that I have... and now I ask for peer review... The following snippets DO NOT work fine under 3.3 st

Fix pf(4) nat proxy port allocation for manually specified ranges... perhaps?

2003-07-26 Thread Melameth, Daniel D.
Newbie running 3.3 stable with pf, dhcpd and isakmpd... ...recently upgraded to stable in the hopes of curing some ill that I have... and now I ask for peer review... (IP addresses changed to hypothetically protect the innocent...) The following snippets work fine under 3.2 release (on similar