On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Jedi/Sector One wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:24:36PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
We're running an X86 box with 512MB ram, nmbclusters = 8192, nkmempages =
81920
Didn't Cedric say that nkmempages 16384 on x86 was instable?
Did you test it that way for a long
On 16/03/2004, Jedi/Sector One [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote To Cedric Berger:
No, i386 current pmap support is very poor, and won't allow you to
reliably allocate more than 64M of RAM.
Thanks for the clarification.
Which is not completly correct, like some insane guy showed us on
misc@ or
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Jedi/Sector One wrote:
What is the highest safe value I should raise NMBCLUSTERS to on x86? How
many states max will it keep?
We're running an X86 box with 512MB ram, nmbclusters = 8192, nkmempages =
81920, and a state limit of 100. In testing I got up to about
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:24:36PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
We're running an X86 box with 512MB ram, nmbclusters = 8192, nkmempages =
81920
Didn't Cedric say that nkmempages 16384 on x86 was instable?
Did you test it that way for a long time?
--
__ /*-Frank DENIS (Jedi/Sector
Hello.
Is there any kernel parameter like NMBCLUSTERS or NKMEMPAGES to increase
in order to let pf work with millions of states? The host has 1Gb ram and
does nothing but transparent firewalling.
TIA,
--
__ /*-Frank DENIS (Jedi/Sector One) j at 42-Networks.Com-*\ __
\ '/
Yes. option NMBCLUSTERS=N , where N is the number of clusters.
Read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq11.html#Network
Jon
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:02:46 +0059
Jedi/Sector One [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Is there any kernel parameter like NMBCLUSTERS or NKMEMPAGES to increase
in
No, i386 current pmap support is very poor, and won't allow you to
reliably allocate more than 64M of RAM.
You might be more lucky with sparc64 or amd64.
Cedric
Jon Mosco wrote:
Yes. option NMBCLUSTERS=N , where N is the number of clusters.
Read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq11.html#Network
Hi Cedric.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:08:13AM +0100, Cedric Berger wrote:
No, i386 current pmap support is very poor, and won't allow you to
reliably allocate more than 64M of RAM.
Thanks for the clarification.
What is the highest safe value I should raise NMBCLUSTERS to on x86? How