Since the tree is already locked for 3.3, this is a post-3.3 issue, so
there's no reason to get agitated over it yet :)
These counters are increased with every packet, and per-packet cost has
the most impact on performance (as compared to per-connection), so this
has to be efficient.
Associating
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:07:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but I am definitely taking notes!...about how many interfaces are there in a
> (GENERIC) kernel? I hadn't even though about them.(ruff estimate's ok, a
> specific answer would just be a wasted on me) ~=)
too many. write a short l
um...is it raining where you are Henning? snow? I agree only one interface
is best - more is against the Unix idea. Stats on an interface come from the
filtering rules - no reason for PF to report more than is requested by the
rules. (bet that would make a slow PF)
1)monitoring traffic on an inter
