On Sunday, Sep 14, 2003, at 17:55 US/Pacific, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
(all the following NICs are in a single bridge)
NIC_A: IP 123.123.0.1, connected to the big bad internet
NIC_B: IP 192.168.0.1, internal network (desktops etc)
NIC_C: IP 10.0.0.1, internal servers (development and staging area)
> > hopefully this is not a millionth repetition of a subject but after
> > reading the PF FAQ and some of the mail archives i am still
> > confused about how bridging, NATing and PFing all work together.
> > the exact path of the packets through the NICs is still a little
> >unclear to me. may
On Thursday, Sep 11, 2003, at 15:52 US/Pacific, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
hopefully this is not a millionth repetition of a subject but after
reading the PF FAQ and some of the mail archives i am still confused
about how bridging, NATing and PFing all work together. the exact path
of the packets
hi,
just a reminder:
NIC_A: IP 123.123.0.1, connected to the big bad internet
NIC_B: IP 192.168.0.1, internal network (desktops etc)
NIC_C: IP 10.0.0.1, internal servers (development and staging area)
NIC_D: NO IP, DMZ 1 (a collection of operational www and mail servers)
NIC_E: NO IP, DMZ 2 (a col
Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
> hello,
Hi,
> here are my questions:
> 1. NATing always happens before PF rules are applied. correct?
This is correct.
> 2. if all the NATing happens on NIC_A, why do i get such entries in my
> state table when an internal desktop tries to reach a server in DMZ 1:
> 192
