On 2008/09/10 12:05, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 09/10/2008 08:54:21 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> HTTP redirects might be the least-overhead method and are usually
>> pretty simple to setup... add a record "www2 A 5.6.7.8", and have the
>> old server just redirect to www2 after the switch-over d
On 09/10/2008 08:54:21 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
HTTP redirects might be the least-overhead method and are usually
pretty simple to setup... add a record "www2 A 5.6.7.8", and have the
old server just redirect to www2 after the switch-over date to catch
any late queries that arrive due to ove
On 2008/09/10 14:26, Fredrik Widlund wrote:
> No, of course, if both servers are alive and "online" at the same
> time, you might as well not redirect the stream. However if you
> need to take the older system offline, or if you need to only have
> one system online at one given time, then redirect
hes in the redirection
of DNS, and it is possible.
Kind regards,
Fredrik Widlund
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 10 september 2008 14:19
To: Fredrik Widlund
Cc: Fubar; PF List
Subject: Re: Reality check
On Sep 10, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Fredrik Widlu
:14
To: Fubar
Cc: PF List
Subject: Re: Reality check
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:37:24PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I'm suffering from sleep deprivation today so benzedrine.cx sounds
inviting ;-)
Anyway a friend has a problem and I'd like a check on the sanity of
my
hazy propose
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dixon
Sent: den 10 september 2008 13:14
To: Fubar
Cc: PF List
Subject: Re: Reality check
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:37:24PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> I'm suffering from sleep deprivation today so benzedrine.cx sounds
&g
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:37:24PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> I'm suffering from sleep deprivation today so benzedrine.cx sounds
> inviting ;-)
>
> Anyway a friend has a problem and I'd like a check on the sanity of my
> hazy proposed solution.
>
> All addresses are fictitious.
>
> X has a we
On 17:37, Wed 10 Sep 08, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> I'm suffering from sleep deprivation today so benzedrine.cx sounds
> inviting ;-)
>
> Anyway a friend has a problem and I'd like a check on the sanity of my
> hazy proposed solution.
>
> All addresses are fictitious.
>
> X has a webserver which has
I'm suffering from sleep deprivation today so benzedrine.cx sounds
inviting ;-)
Anyway a friend has a problem and I'd like a check on the sanity of my
hazy proposed solution.
All addresses are fictitious.
X has a webserver which has address 1.2.3.4 He wants to change his
hosting to another provi
