On 17:37, Wed 10 Sep 08, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I'm suffering from sleep deprivation today so benzedrine.cx sounds
inviting ;-)
Anyway a friend has a problem and I'd like a check on the sanity of my
hazy proposed solution.
All addresses are fictitious.
X has a webserver which has address
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:37:24PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I'm suffering from sleep deprivation today so benzedrine.cx sounds
inviting ;-)
Anyway a friend has a problem and I'd like a check on the sanity of my
hazy proposed solution.
All addresses are fictitious.
X has a webserver
To: Fubar
Cc: PF List
Subject: Re: Reality check
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:37:24PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I'm suffering from sleep deprivation today so benzedrine.cx sounds
inviting ;-)
Anyway a friend has a problem and I'd like a check on the sanity of
my
hazy proposed solution.
All addresses
in the redirection
of DNS, and it is possible.
Kind regards,
Fredrik Widlund
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 10 september 2008 14:19
To: Fredrik Widlund
Cc: Fubar; PF List
Subject: Re: Reality check
On Sep 10, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Fredrik Widlund
[EMAIL
On 2008/09/10 14:26, Fredrik Widlund wrote:
No, of course, if both servers are alive and online at the same
time, you might as well not redirect the stream. However if you
need to take the older system offline, or if you need to only have
one system online at one given time, then redirecting
On 09/10/2008 08:54:21 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
HTTP redirects might be the least-overhead method and are usually
pretty simple to setup... add a record www2 A 5.6.7.8, and have the
old server just redirect to www2 after the switch-over date to catch
any late queries that arrive due to
On 2008/09/10 12:05, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 09/10/2008 08:54:21 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
HTTP redirects might be the least-overhead method and are usually
pretty simple to setup... add a record www2 A 5.6.7.8, and have the
old server just redirect to www2 after the switch-over date to