I just finished upgrading a 3.2 -stable box to yesterday's snapshot to
try out the new IP ID feature (where is that documented?). Anyhoo,
there was one rule in the pf.conf that was fine in 3.2, but the snapshot
is choking on:
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from $other_net to ($int_if)/24 flags
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:51:14PM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
Is there any reason to have 10 ways of writing the same thing? Shouldn't
we choose a syntax and stick with that?
if you think about it for a minute,
$interface/24
and
$interface:network
are not the same.
they CAN expand to teh
if you think about it for a minute,
$interface/24
and
$interface:network
are not the same.
they CAN expand to teh same thing. one possibility. just one.
Well true, but in most cases where this is used, the intent is
the latter (the network $interface sits on). I would expect
:network
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:08:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you think about it for a minute,
$interface/24
and
$interface:network
are not the same.
they CAN expand to teh same thing. one possibility. just one.
Well true, but in most cases where this is used, the
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 17:40, Jason Dixon wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 15:06, Henning Brauer wrote:
I assumed it was due to the expansion ($int_if)/24, so I tried with a
single IP, and that fixed it. What is the new syntax like for cidr
expansion on an interface? I can't find any
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:49:43PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 18:38, Henning Brauer wrote:
$int_if:network expands properly, but dynamic () does not work (again,
passes test mode ok, but fails with a reload).
WHAT does not work?
($interface:network) is not supposed
