Re: grouped tcp flags

2003-04-01 Thread Philipp Buehler
[list added again, I think this is public interest and should be archived] On 01/04/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just wanted to drop all nmap and/or other harmful packets... I found half of this list of flags @ nmap's forums by a guy saying which to

Re: grouped tcp flags

2003-04-01 Thread Max Laier
If you dont want port XYZ being reached. Block it. Completly. No matter what fuxxored flag ever is set. Period. //pb Agreed, but a quick block on some of the common nmap flags on the very top of your ruleset can save you some time (right?) Esp. when somebody went mad, has a big pipe and

Re: grouped tcp flags

2003-04-01 Thread Philipp Buehler
On 01/04/2003, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you dont want port XYZ being reached. Block it. Completly. No matter what fuxxored flag ever is set. Period. Agreed, but a quick block on some of the common nmap flags on the very top of your ruleset can save you

Re: grouped tcp flags

2003-04-01 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 08:37:52AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: flags = flags ( flag-set / flag-set | / flag-set ) flag-set = [ F ] [ S ] [ R ] [ P ] [ A ] [ U ] [ E ] [ W ] this is wrong.. who wrote that shit? :) The first part of the RHS is the literal flags

Re: grouped tcp flags

2003-04-01 Thread Max Laier
Agreed, but a quick block on some of the common nmap flags on the very top of your ruleset can save you some time (right?) Esp. when somebody went mad, has a big pipe and found out about insane-nmap timeing. *sigh* And all other tcp packets (which are most likely to happen more often)

Re: grouped tcp flags

2003-03-31 Thread pb
On 01/04/2003, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: will the following work? Does pf syntax allow this? BadTCPFlags={ FUP, FUP/FUP, SF/SFRA, /SFRA, F/SFRA, U/SFRAU, P, \ FS/FS, FSRPAU, /FSRPAU } block in quick proto tcp all flags $BadTCPFlags no