Christopher Keeley wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I have an idea which I would like to run by developers and users alike.
> Does anyone think 'pattern matching' on packets values would be
> a useful addition to pf' current capabilities?
>
> The idea would be to allow users to write simple numeric sequen
On 29 Aug 2004 08:01:40 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Keeley)
wrote:
>Does anyone think 'pattern matching' on packets values would be
>a useful addition to pf' current capabilities?
As with the equivalent on iptables its a crap idea.
Using tools such as snortsam one generate rules to d
On Aug 28, 2004, at 12:08 PM, Christopher Keeley wrote:
I have an idea which I would like to run by developers and users alike.
Does anyone think 'pattern matching' on packets values would be
a useful addition to pf' current capabilities?
A simple search of the list archives reveals this has been r
Sort of like a kernel-layer snort? That would be cool.
Christopher Keeley [28/08/04 17:08 +0100]:
> Dear All
>
> I have an idea which I would like to run by developers and users alike.
>
> Does anyone think 'pattern matching' on packets values would be
> a useful addition to pf' current capabil
Dear All
I have an idea which I would like to run by developers and users alike.
Does anyone think 'pattern matching' on packets values would be
a useful addition to pf' current capabilities?
The idea would be to allow users to write simple numeric sequences
representing packet values into the
