Re: Regarding #8580

ation that could be useful to an attacker. > To avoid this kind of confusion, it might be better to add a separate > 'Login with LDAP' button on the login page (Please refer to the attached > screenshot). This way, users can choose the right option directly. > > On Fri, May 9,

Re: Regarding #8580

On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 12:48, Akshay Joshi wrote: > > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 4:50 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 12:14, Akshay Joshi >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 4:20 PM Dave Page

Re: Regarding #8580

On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 12:14, Akshay Joshi wrote: > > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 4:20 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 11:34, Khushboo Vashi < >> khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On

Re: Regarding #8580

On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 11:34, Khushboo Vashi wrote: > > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 3:23 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 08:45, Akshay Joshi >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Hackers/Dave, >>> >>> I have started worki

Re: Regarding #8580

ready display N buttons for N OAuth2 configurations, > which can be removed for a cleaner user experience. > OR > Alternatively, add a separate button labeled "Login with LDAP" to > explicitly trigger LDAP authentication. > I don't like this solution, as it requires the end user to understand how their admin has setup the backend authentication. That seems like something they shouldn't need to concern themselves with. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

Re: pgAdmin logo contribution

that non-code contributions such as string review/revision, or doc improvements would be more valuable to the project, if that's something that interests you. Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

Re: Require suggestions on feature #5766

; updated directly to the newest release. > > Please share your suggestions on this. > Do the zip files include the version number (and is that also included in the URLs above)? > Thanks, > Anil > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:53 PM Anil Sahoo > wrote: > >> Okay

Re: Regarding Feature #5305

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 12:42, Akshay Joshi wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 5:11 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 11:12, Akshay Joshi >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dave/Hackers, >>> >>> I have started work

Re: Require suggestions on feature #5766

pdates manually then can > prefer this and if update is available then the *"Restart to update"* > option will show and if clicked will quit the app and install the latest > version. > > Let me know in which way we can proceed. > Option 1 seems good to me; though the curre

Re: Regarding Feature #5305

backend. > > Any other solution or suggestion? > This seems like it would be a very large amount of work, for very little gain, and would certainly be inconsistent with how we would expect to browse files and folders for example. I do not think it is worth the effort. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

Re: Role based access control discussion

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 10:11, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 3:39 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 09:39, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com&g

Re: Role based access control discussion

Hi On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 09:39, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 09:11, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.tosh

Re: Role based access control discussion

cating server functionality anyway. > Tools > >1. Tool access like query tool, backup, etc. > > Storage Manager: > >1. Create/Edit/Delete file. >2. Create/Edit/Delete folders. > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 8:47 PM Aditya Toshniwal < > aditya.t

Re: Role based access control discussion

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 13:19, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 4:54 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 11:07, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wro

Re: Regarding feature #3319

ters used in the JSON (excluding the password that we can prompt for of course)? > > Thanks, > Yogesh Mahajan > EnterpriseDB > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 4:59 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 11:20, Yogesh Mahajan < >> yogesh.m

Re: Regarding feature #3319

Hi On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 11:20, Yogesh Mahajan < yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Couple of follow up questions - > > Thanks, > Yogesh Mahajan > EnterpriseDB > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 4:37 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >&

Re: Role based access control discussion

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 11:07, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 4:27 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 10:26, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.co

Re: Regarding feature #3319

ow may get additional in future. > Yes :-). Ideally, as much of the original state as possible should be restored. > 2.Can we use an existing crypt key to encrypt the query data or simply > json encoding should be enough? > We're already storing the query history, so we should f

Re: Role based access control discussion

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 10:26, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 3:36 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 06:16, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.

Re: Role based access control discussion

signed to users. >7. Permissions will be used to >8. Admin role remains static with no changes allowed. > > Let me know your thoughts on this. If everything looks good then I will > proceed. > What permissions would we support initially? -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

Re: Disabled or Not applicable Tabs design

sabled tabs. The tabs > will enable/disable based on the format selected. > > Please share your feedback on this. > > > [image: image.png] > Normally when something is disabled, it is simply greyed out and made to not respond to input. Why not do the same here instead of de

Re: Regarding feature #3319

On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 10:56, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 3:22 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 03:52, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.co

Re: Regarding feature #3319

On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 03:52, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 6:55 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 12:24, Yogesh Mahajan < >> yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com&

Re: Regarding feature #3319

On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 12:24, Yogesh Mahajan < yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 5:12 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 06:37, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com&

Re: Regarding feature #3319

t;> <https://twitter.com/edbpostgres?lang=en> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/EDBpostgres> >>>> <https://www.instagram.com/EDBpostgres/> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 11:40 AM Aditya Toshniwal < >&g

Re: Require sugeestion for #1235

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 11:25, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 4:30 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 10:51, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.

Re: Require sugeestion for #1235

It's not entirely what Dave is suggesting. He's suggesting the split > button dropdown should have a checkmark to set the default behaviour of the > button. > @Dave Page In that case it will contradict with Save > and Save As. Save As here is an extension of the menu and not th

Re: pgAdmin Async Server Cursor

rsor*. > That might be our solution in general - have a per-query-tool-instance option to specify client or server cursor. If you choose server, you lose the row count, but get the performance. If you choose client, you get the current behaviour. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

Re: Require suggestions on feature #5766

for the initial version we simply disable auto-update for machine wide installations, and think about supporting them for admin users in the future when we can properly check that we have the desired permissions. We should also consider changes to the installer - e.g. perhaps make the per-user in

Re: Require suggestions on feature #5766

s, as we are using Inno setup for creating our Windows > installer, we can try updating our application with existing way only, if > something does not work then we have the option to change our installer > creation process. > So one thing that springs to mind is that on Windows, thi

Re: Add support for tags on a server node

t; when adding shared servers. In future, it can be helpful as a filter > criteria. If you agree then I can create a git issue. Below is a sample. > Let me know what you think. > > [image: Screenshot 2024-11-28 at 15.44.28.png] > That seems like it could be useful. -- Dave Page pgAdmin

Re: Require suggestions on feature #5766

m one of them *must* be used? Our current installer is pretty standard in the way it works, so I'm curious to know if we would actually need to change technology for a specific reason. Thanks! -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

Re: Require suggestion for issue #6513

- Added appropriate icons for the "Disconnect" and "Delete" >>> actions. >>> >>> I would like your input on whether these changes should be applied >>> universally across all delete and disconnect scenarios, or if they should >>> be limited to just the database delete and disconnect actions. >>> >>> Please find the attached screenshots showcasing the changes. >>> >>> >>> Thank you for your feedback! >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Rohit Bhati >>> >>> >>> >> -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

Re: Require suggestions on feature 6794

e it. > Or do some string substitution in the command, e.g. /path/to/passexec.sh $HOST$ $PORT$ or similar, so the user has even more flexibility. I know that is done in PEM in a few places, possibly in pgAdmin too, though I don't recall offhand (if it is, we should be consistent on how the param

Re: Require suggestions on feature 6794

vironment variables. > > > Please share your suggestions or feedback on the approach I am proposing. > I'm not sure why the user would need to set environment variables - wouldn't pgAdmin just set them in the environment of the passexec process, based on the server definitio

Re: Next Library/Package update

gt;>>>3. Mui 5 >>>>>4. Code Mirror 6 >>>>>5. React Aspen tree with React Arborist ( >>>>>https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-arborist) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Akshay Joshi >>>>> Principal Software Architect >>>>> www.enterprisedb.com >>>>> >>>>> *Blog*: https://www.enterprisedb.com/akshay-joshi >>>>> *GitHub*: https://github.com/akshay-joshi >>>>> *LinkedIn*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/akshay-joshi-086497216 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com> >>>> >>>> Pravesh Sharma >>>> >>>> Software Engineer >>>> >>>> +91 9406461406 >>>> >>>> www.enterprisedb.com >>>> >>>> Power to Postgres >>>> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/edbpostgres> >>>> <https://twitter.com/edbpostgres?lang=en> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/EDBpostgres> >>>> <https://www.instagram.com/EDBpostgres/> >>>> >>> > > -- > > > Pravesh Sharma > > Senior SDE > > +91 9406461406 > > > enterprisedb.com > -- Dave Page VP, Chief Architect, Database Infrastructure EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Require suggestion for issue #8007

On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 16:30, Pravesh Sharma wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 6:34 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 13:56, Pravesh Sharma < >> pravesh.sha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Hacker

Re: Require suggestion for issue #8007

ype is character. > > Please provide your suggestions which solution looks good to you. > Why not include the length in the cast? We know what the input string is, so can't we just do the equivalent of: 'pgadmin'::character(7); -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Require suggestions for Issue #2874

; On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 2:42 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Shadow is more visible, but it doesn't really follow the material UI >> styling which is flat rather than 3D. >> >> I think Anil's idea is worth exploring; remove the alternatin

Re: Require suggestions for Issue #2874

ards > Rohit Bhati > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 4:11 PM Rohit Bhati > wrote: > >> I already set weight to 900. >> If we need to be more distinct then I think we can have some shadow or if >> anything else please suggest. >> >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at

Re: Require suggestions for Issue #2874

till needs more weight. > > Thanks > Rohit Bhati > EnterpriseDB > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:01 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 6 Sept 2024 at 09:25, Rohit Bhati >> wrote: >> >>> I have made some more changes with cha

Re: Require suggestions for Issue #2874

. > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 1:51 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Fri, 6 Sept 2024 at 09:19, Rohit Bhati >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have removed the border and background color, just made the row >>> numbe

Re: Require suggestions for Issue #2874

e - and I think we still need some other visual distinction, such as the column background colour. > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 12:35 PM Khushboo Vashi < > khushboo.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 7:11 PM Dave Page wrote: &g

Re: Require suggestions for Issue #2874

ght not be to me, but I haven't tested. I wonder also if we should make the row numbers bold all the time. Thoughts? -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PGDay UK 2024, 11th September, London: https://2024.pgday.uk/

Re: Require suggestions for Issue #2874

7;s the one :-) > > > Rohit Bhati > EnterpriseDB > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:51 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 08:27, Rohit Bhati >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Hackers, >>> >>> Please check the up

Re: Require suggestions for Issue #2874

distinction from the data columns. Probably worth working on that one at the same time? -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PGDay UK 2024, 11th September, London: https://2024.pgday.uk/

Re: Require suggestions on issue #7811

On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 10:51, Yogesh Mahajan < yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Thanks, > Yogesh Mahajan > EnterpriseDB > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:11 PM Dave Page wrote: > > Hi > > Hi >> >> On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 10:32, Yoge

Re: Require suggestions on issue #7811

only load the servers once into any given configuration database. > > Also, on restart admin user specified while container is not recreated. > Can't we fix on similar lines? > > Thanks, > Yogesh Mahajan > EnterpriseDB > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 2:05 PM Dave Page wr

Re: Require suggestions on issue #7811

On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 09:29, Pravesh Sharma < pravesh.sha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 1:47 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 09:10, Pravesh Sharma < >> pravesh.sha...@enterprisedb.com> w

Re: Require suggestions on issue #7811

ts in the database. If it does, we would skip > registering it again. > > > Please share any suggestions or feedback on this approach. > I would say "Won't fix". If someone is using persistent storage for settings, why launch containers to import the same servers over a

Re: Regarding feature #3319

ated to panels in the pgAdmin 4's configured database file. Through > debouncing we will be able to call the API at certain intervals of user > interaction, and it will update the stored data related to workspace and > all other panels. > OK. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pg

Re: #7076 - Keychain access on Mac

On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 13:46, Yogesh Mahajan wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Should I proceed with this approach? > Sure, go ahead. > > Thanks, > Yogesh Mahajan > EnterpriseDB > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 6:14 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu

Re: #7076 - Keychain access on Mac

On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 13:38, Yogesh Mahajan wrote: > > > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 5:58 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 at 13:27, Yogesh Mahajan < >> yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Hacker

Re: #7076 - Keychain access on Mac

. > That sounds almost like returning to the way things used to work with the master password, except we auto-generate it, and store that in the keychain. I assume we'd do the same on all platforms, using whatever the equivalent store is on each? Any idea why it asks for the login passwo

Re: pgAdmin4 v8.10 candidate builds

Hi On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 13:55, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 6:15 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 13:37, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@

Re: pgAdmin4 v8.10 candidate builds

>>>>>>>> Yogesh, could you please verify this for Thursday's release? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Note:- We have transitioned from NW.js to Electron starting with >>>>>>>> this release.* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Akshay Joshi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Principle Software Architect >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> enterprisedb.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * Blog*: https://www.enterprisedb.com/akshay-joshi >>>>>>>> * GitHub*: https://github.com/akshay-joshi >>>>>>>> * LinkedIn*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/akshay-joshi-086497216 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Aditya Toshniwal >>>>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com* >>>>> <https://www.enterprisedb.com/> >>>>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Aditya Toshniwal >>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com* >>> <https://www.enterprisedb.com/> >>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" >>> >> > > -- > Thanks, > Aditya Toshniwal > pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com* > <https://www.enterprisedb.com/> > "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE" > -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PGDay UK 2024, 11th September, London: https://2024.pgday.uk/

Re: Query tool data grid - Infinite scroll vs Pagination

definite benefits, but there is the downside of having to scroll and click to browse results. Personally I'm fine with that, but I think you should probably poll pgadmin-support for opinions from more users. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Potential Security Issue: Permissions in PgAdmin Installation Directory

Akshay, could you or one of the team look into this please? Thanks. On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 23:27, Qasim Tahir wrote: > Hi, > Platform and package details are below > > Platform: *Rocky 8.9* > *pgadmin *version*: 8.7* > > Regards > Qasim > > On Sat, Jun 1, 20

Re: Messages held for moderation

thing on my part in this regard? > In this case it was almost certainly held because you cross-posted to multiple lists. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Potential Security Issue: Permissions in PgAdmin Installation Directory

modifications. > > > I would like to ask if these permissions are necessary for PgAdmin's > operation or if they could be tightened to enhance security. > > Your guidance on this matter would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you for your attention to this issue. > Wha

Re: Regarding feature #6841

That is exactly the sort of behaviour I was afraid of :-(. At least we have safeguards in place to minimise the chances of the user running something unexpected. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Regarding feature #6841

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 14:43, Thom Brown wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 13:50, Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 12:03, Thom Brown wrote: >> >>> >>>> You've been able to do the "Select and run" thing for years

Re: Regarding feature #6841

/www.linkedin.com/company/edbpostgres> > <https://twitter.com/edbpostgres?lang=en> > <https://www.facebook.com/EDBpostgres> > <https://www.instagram.com/EDBpostgres/> > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:45 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Adding some notes below

Re: Regarding feature #6841

e it on. > Yes, I have made that very clear to the team. Suggestions for test scenarios are welcome of course - a good way to experiment might be to see how the current version of pgAdmin (which uses the new CodeMirror code) manages to mess up syntax highlighting of anything weird. -

Re: Regarding feature #6841

On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 11:29, Thom Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 09:15 Dave Page wrote: > >> Adding some notes below to summarise a discussion we had on this in a >> call... >> >> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 08:26, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@

Re: Regarding feature #6841

> wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 7:05 PM Dave Page wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 14:32, Aditya Toshniwal < >>> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Dave,

Re: Regarding feature #6841

Hi On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 14:32, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 6:22 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 11:56, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterpr

Re: Regarding feature #6841

out taking up a lot of space). BTW, if we do figure out a way of doing this that we all agree is safe, I'm going to want to see a bunch of automated tests against valid EPAS and PG queries, as weird and bizarre as we can think of. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Regarding feature #6841

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 05:15, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 8:07 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 15:26, Anil Sahoo >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dave,

Re: Regarding feature #6841

din.com/company/edbpostgres> > <https://twitter.com/edbpostgres?lang=en> > <https://www.facebook.com/EDBpostgres> > <https://www.instagram.com/EDBpostgres/> > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 2:24 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Wed, 17 Apr

Re: Regarding feature #6841

he query string? How does it cope with an anonymous block containing multiple queries, or a pl/whatever function definition that might contain queries within its text? Or a view definition? -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Github notifications to pgadmin-hackers disabled

https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4. Thanks. -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Supported platforms for pgAdmin 4.

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 09:29, Khushboo Vashi wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 2:32 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 04:55, Yogesh Mahajan < >> yogesh.maha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dave, >>>

Re: Supported platforms for pgAdmin 4.

> That sounds reasonable to me (for the next release, not the in-progress one). Any other opinions from folks? -- Dave Page pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] b4f517: Rename tasks in workflows to allow rule enforcemen...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: b4f517f7ff0a1475f0a0b5c700eb18a496c7ab6b https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/b4f517f7ff0a1475f0a0b5c700eb18a496c7ab6b Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-10-05 (Thu, 05 Oct 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] 5a26ca: Use PG16 as the default in the container.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: 5a26cad588260b8abeaa56a83b8fd17a0abbc6a6 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/5a26cad588260b8abeaa56a83b8fd17a0abbc6a6 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-09-21 (Thu, 21 Sep 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] e5c249: Remove version from SSL libs

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: e5c249e81c7e21a36c3cdacf36f74fe095e1ea8a https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/e5c249e81c7e21a36c3cdacf36f74fe095e1ea8a Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-09-04 (Mon, 04 Sep 2023) Changed

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

. name:"QuickLookUIServi" >>>> 4. pid:938 >>>> 5. row_number:331 >>>> >>>> Okay, so it is an issue of null value then. >>> Are null values being returned for all processes or only for specific >>> ones? >>&g

Re: Request for inputs on #6208 - MaxQueuePool Issue

ooling using NullPool.A Pool which does not pool connections. >> Instead it literally opens and closes the underlying DB-API connection per >> each connection open/close. Using NullPool may impact the performance. >> >> What approach should be followed to fix the issue? &g

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] e06d39: Cleanup some more unnecessary artefacts from the b...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: e06d39b70c86eca5e4130416356cd491c14a2bc0 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/e06d39b70c86eca5e4130416356cd491c14a2bc0 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-08-10 (Thu, 10 Aug 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] 8651a1: Don't silence progress messages when building the ...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: 8651a1ed45108830a98fc9f8be1c9d599f075153 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/8651a1ed45108830a98fc9f8be1c9d599f075153 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-07-24 (Mon, 24 Jul 2023) Changed

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 11:47, Sahil Harpal wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 15:34, Dave Page wrote: > >> On your system, what are the volumes without letters etc? If they're >> things like swap/pagefile, recovery partition etc, then they can probably >> be o

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

things like swap/pagefile, recovery partition etc, then they can probably be omitted (e.g. SELECT ... WHERE mount_point IS NOT NULL OR drive_letter IS NOT NULL). -- Dave Page Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] 038ab5: Correct bin path for EPAS.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: 038ab5eb90c7afc53073dc03f5a274c55c26ba27 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/038ab5eb90c7afc53073dc03f5a274c55c26ba27 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] de7eb7: Fix a copy/paste error.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: de7eb738675f201363793509a1f4e95b2aee8332 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/de7eb738675f201363793509a1f4e95b2aee8332 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] be1bdb: Run feature tests on Github.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: be1bdbcd144302db68d8209008dbd596b6930d42 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/be1bdbcd144302db68d8209008dbd596b6930d42 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] dd9219: Un-break the doc build.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: dd92196c40b05c5e39f6f862fba95a01e652ab18 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/dd92196c40b05c5e39f6f862fba95a01e652ab18 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-07-05 (Wed, 05 Jul 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] 6b232b: Remove unsupported PostgreSQL versions from the co...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: 6b232ba7e8a6da958d38ffaa3b603dbf53bea2fe https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/6b232ba7e8a6da958d38ffaa3b603dbf53bea2fe Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-07-05 (Wed, 05 Jul 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] cba689: Fix typo.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: cba689dcd96013cfe5a0e2a6d178c9ed4a05bed3 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/cba689dcd96013cfe5a0e2a6d178c9ed4a05bed3 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-07-03 (Mon, 03 Jul 2023) Changed

[pgadmin-org/pgadmin4] 8f6d01: Clarify the LICENSE file to indicate the it is the...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4 Commit: 8f6d016df005cd9d4291b2b4bbe3afef4f9e8b72 https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/8f6d016df005cd9d4291b2b4bbe3afef4f9e8b72 Author: Dave Page Date: 2023-07-03 (Mon, 03 Jul 2023) Changed

Re: Arm64 builds of pgAdmin

Hopefully we’ll figure it out soon. -- -- Dave Page https://pgsnake.blogspot.com EDB Postgres https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

see in the attached image, insights are not properly visible since > the difference between the values is too large. Even when the process count > is 320, without tooltips, it appears as zero. Can we draw separate graphs > for both? Or do you think the current single combined version is fine?

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 21:01, Sahil Harpal wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 20:51, Dave Page wrote: > >> I'd aim for 3 graphs per row on a normal display (Total Reads/Total >> Writes, Bytes Read/Bytes Written, Time Reading/Time Writing). >> >

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 16:11, Sahil Harpal wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 14:07, Dave Page wrote: > >> >> Seems reasonable to me. A wireframe would seem like the best next step, >> to confirm we're all happy with what's proposed. It's hard to vi

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

ltrack] >> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;> >> Sender >> notified by >> Mailtrack >> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

O)* > >- Sys Disk Information >- Sys I/O Analysis Information > > > I have also attached the dashboard layout, as you suggested. > Seems reasonable to me. A wireframe would seem like the best next step, to confirm we're all happy with what's proposed. It's

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

k combining R/W is fine, as long as it uses two scales in case the values are wildly different (which is likely). > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 3:22 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 09:55, Sahil Harpal >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Adit

Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design

me. Seems you have created a new tab >>>>> System Statistics instead of using the existing dashboard. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 4:27 PM Sahil Harpal < >>>>> sahilharpal1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>&g

Re: Required inputs in issue #6138

t an error > notification with content *"could not find the specified table."*) > I think this is fine. The View/Edit data window shows the query with table/schema name after all, so the user should expect it to work. -- Dave Page Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: Drop support for Python 3.7?

On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 07:55, Aditya Toshniwal < aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 7:04 PM Dave Page wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 14:23, Aditya Toshniwal < >> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >