On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:58 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>> 2) This option is not very appealing to me, because we would be pilling
code into the QT portion of the application, that I hope we remove in the
future, that currently is
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hello Hackers
>
> In the PoC we did with Electron last month this was the point where we
> stopped
>
> What did we accomplish:
> - Use Electron as a runtime and packaging solution for the applica
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Robert Eckhardt
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>>> (And don't give up on proper tabs either, but I'm sure Electron might
>>> catch up in that eventually -- and the issue around RHEL6 will also go away
>>> eventually)
>>>
>>
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>> 3) Electron
>>>
>>> Pros:
>>> - Full Javascript runtime, no more C++ code to handle
>>> - Self packaging for all the environments
>>> Cons:
>>> - No fully supported on Linux based OS with old libstdc++, (This might
>>> solve the problem: h
Hello Hackers
In the PoC we did with Electron last month this was the point where we
stopped
What did we accomplish:
- Use Electron as a runtime and packaging solution for the application
- Support opening new windows when the preferences ask for them
- Make the application generally work
- U
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> 2) This option is not very appealing to me, because we would be pilling
>>> code into the QT portion of the application, that I hope we remove in the
>>> future, that currently is untested to solve a problem caused by a Window
>>> Manager.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Magnus Hagander
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
>> jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Hackers,
>>> Here is our take on the 3 options present:
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Magnus Hagander
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
> jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
>> Hello Hackers,
>> Here is our take on the 3 options present:
>>
>
> This looks like a good summary, so I'm going to pick this on
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
> Here is our take on the 3 options present:
>
This looks like a good summary, so I'm going to pick this one to comment on
:)
> 1) QtWebkit and QtWebEngine
>
> Pros:
> - Webkit is
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
> Here is our take on the 3 options present:
> 1) QtWebkit and QtWebEngine
>
> Pros:
> - Webkit is a mature technology that as been around for some time
> - Apparently the Fork of W
Hello Hackers,
Here is our take on the 3 options present:
1) QtWebkit and QtWebEngine
Pros:
- Webkit is a mature technology that as been around for some time
- Apparently the Fork of Webkit we were using as been catching up
Cons:
- We are using a Fork
- It is to far behind of the today browsers an
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> All,
>
> As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
> yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
> later. This is because the GTK project, and later Gnome, have removed
> support for
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Neel Patel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
>> yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
>> later. This is
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> All,
>
> As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
> yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
> later. This is because the GTK project, and later Gnome, have removed
> support
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> All,
>
> As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
> yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
> later. This is because the GTK project, and later Gnome, have removed
> support for
All,
As you know, the 3.0 release is currently on hold as we discovered late
yesterday that the re-vamped desktop runtime will not run on Gnome 3.26 and
later. This is because the GTK project, and later Gnome, have removed
support for the System Tray on which the new runtime relies.
They have rep
16 matches
Mail list logo