Dave Page a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Option 1 seems not very user friendly to me. Are you against option 2? if
yes, why?
Yes, because it's inconsistent to offer the feature in all but two
dialogues. With option 1, the worst that wil
Author: guillaume
Date: 2008-06-16 21:55:29 +0100 (Mon, 16 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 7376
Revision summary: http://svn.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?rev=7376&view=rev
Log:
Adds a colour button that opens the standard colour dialog, so that the user
doesn't
need to know the HTML colour coding
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Option 1 seems not very user friendly to me. Are you against option 2? if
> yes, why?
Yes, because it's inconsistent to offer the feature in all but two
dialogues. With option 1, the worst that will happen is the user
Dave Page a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grmbl... There's a big flaw in my patch. You're right once again.
Meh. It's happened a couple of times now :-)
hehe
Problem is, pgAdmin divide the queries to launch in two groups, only for
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grmbl... There's a big flaw in my patch. You're right once again.
Meh. It's happened a couple of times now :-)
> Problem is, pgAdmin divide the queries to launch in two groups, only for
> some objects : database and
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page a écrit :
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>
>> You spelt colour wrong :-). Other than that (and the possible issue
>> above),
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I'd forgotten about that. We do it because it allows us to run
> non-transaction safe DDL in separate transactions (which is required
> in 8.3). Actually, this is not a major issue - all that will happen is
> that the ser
Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Comments?
You spelt colour wrong :-). Other than that (and the possible issue
above), looks good.
Can I commit this patch?
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally, here is the prototype. As I first talked about this one year
ago, I
will summarize the idea : adding a checkbox on the SQL tab of an
object's
properties to le
Author: hiroshi
Date: 2008-06-16 16:51:53 +0100 (Mon, 16 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 7375
Revision summary: http://svn.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?rev=7375&view=rev
Log:
add the v1.8.4
Modified:
trunk/www/download/opensuse.php
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@p
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Chris St Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I upgraded slony on the servers from 1.2.13 to 1.2.14 and downloaded the
> 1.2.14 creation scripts to my client.
>
> I created the new empty cluster and did a "upgrade node" on the old cluster,
> selecting the new one fro
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The roadmap still shows I need to work on the server status window. But it
> doesn't explain what I have in mind. Dave gave me some hints and todos. Here
> is my todo list on this :
>
Snip todo list...
> The l
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page a écrit :
>>
>> http://svn.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/branches/REL-1_2_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3/docs/en_US/prop_page_design.html
>> (which needs to be resurrected).
>>
>
> It sure needs. http://wiki.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh, and just so you know, some of the tools out there are not Open
>> Source. pgAdmin is not a political project, and I wouldn't want us to
>> discount something that may be a great tool purely because it's not
>> OSS.
Dave Page a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm sure I'll complain quickly enough :-p
I hope so :)
Hmm, here we go then (having tried the patch) :-(
- On a purely personal level, I'm not sure I like it. I think the
dialogues in general w
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm sure I'll complain quickly enough :-p
>
> I hope so :)
Hmm, here we go then (having tried the patch) :-(
- On a purely personal level, I'm not sure I like it. I think the
dialogues in general were much more aest
Dave Page a écrit :
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm thinking about doing a complete review of our dialogs. During my work on
the comment tab, I found many dialogs not using spacers and sizers. So, I
would like to add them and, if at all possible
Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My main concern is to be able to create table on my laptop (monitor size
1280x800) and the previous size didn't allow this to me.
Seems reasonable. Note that I was intending to redesign the table
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My main concern is to be able to create table on my laptop (monitor size
> 1280x800) and the previous size didn't allow this to me.
Seems reasonable. Note that I was intending to redesign the table
dialogue anyway -
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm thinking about doing a complete review of our dialogs. During my work on
> the comment tab, I found many dialogs not using spacers and sizers. So, I
> would like to add them and, if at all possible, make
20 matches
Mail list logo
